Orthodontic treatment for kids is a specialized process that requires a careful balance between data-driven decisions and clinical judgment. The journey typically begins with an initial assessment and diagnosis, which are crucial steps in determining the best course of action for each young patient.
During the initial assessment, orthodontists gather a wealth of information. This includes a thorough examination of the child's dental and facial structure, often supplemented by X-rays, photographs, and models of the teeth. These diagnostic tools provide a comprehensive view of the child's orthodontic needs. Some orthodontic issues are inherited while others develop over time Dental braces for children patient. The data collected is not just about identifying problems like misaligned teeth or jaw discrepancies; it's also about understanding the growth patterns and developmental stage of the child.
Clinical judgment plays a vital role in interpreting this data. Orthodontists use their experience and expertise to assess not just what is visibly wrong, but also to predict future dental developments. This foresight is crucial in orthodontics, especially for children whose jaws and teeth are still growing. The orthodontist must decide the optimal time to intervene, considering both the immediate needs and the long-term growth of the child.
Once the assessment is complete and a diagnosis is made, the orthodontist outlines a treatment plan. This plan is tailored to the individual needs of the child, taking into account their unique dental structure, growth patterns, and even their lifestyle. The treatment might involve various appliances like braces, aligners, or retainers, each chosen based on a combination of clinical data and professional judgment.
Throughout the treatment process, regular monitoring and adjustments are essential. The orthodontist continually assesses the progress, making necessary modifications to the treatment plan as the child's teeth and jaw evolve. This dynamic approach ensures that the treatment remains effective and aligned with the child's changing needs.
In conclusion, the orthodontic treatment process for kids is a delicate interplay of data analysis and clinical expertise. It requires a deep understanding of both the science behind dental structures and the art of applying that knowledge to each unique case. This balance ensures not only effective treatment but also a positive experience for the young patient.
In the field of orthodontics, striking a balance between data-driven approaches and clinical judgment is essential for delivering effective and personalized treatment plans. While evidence-based practices provide a solid foundation for treatment protocols, the role of clinical judgment cannot be understated when tailoring these plans to meet individual patient needs. This essay explores the significance of clinical judgment in orthodontics and how it complements empirical data to optimize patient outcomes.
Orthodontic treatment is inherently complex, involving a multitude of factors such as patient age, dental and skeletal structures, growth patterns, and personal preferences. While standardized protocols and algorithms derived from research studies offer valuable guidelines, they often fail to account for the unique nuances of each patient. This is where clinical judgment becomes indispensable.
Clinical judgment allows orthodontists to interpret data within the context of a patient's specific circumstances. It enables practitioners to assess factors that may not be readily quantifiable, such as a patient's motivation, compliance with treatment, and psychological well-being. By integrating these subjective elements with objective data, orthodontists can make informed decisions that go beyond mere statistical averages.
Moreover, clinical judgment facilitates adaptive treatment strategies. Orthodontic treatment is a dynamic process that requires ongoing evaluation and adjustment. As patients progress through their treatment, unforeseen challenges may arise, necessitating modifications to the initial plan. Clinical judgment empowers orthodontists to recognize these changes and adapt treatment protocols accordingly, ensuring that patients receive the most appropriate care at every stage.
Additionally, clinical judgment fosters a patient-centered approach to orthodontics. By involving patients in the decision-making process and considering their preferences and concerns, orthodontists can enhance treatment adherence and satisfaction. This collaborative approach not only improves outcomes but also strengthens the therapeutic relationship between practitioner and patient.
In conclusion, while data-driven approaches provide a valuable framework for orthodontic treatment, clinical judgment plays a crucial role in tailoring these plans to individual patient needs. By integrating empirical evidence with subjective assessment and adaptive strategies, orthodontists can deliver personalized care that optimizes both clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Balancing data and clinical judgment is therefore essential for achieving excellence in orthodontic practice.
In the ever-evolving field of orthodontics, the integration of diagnostic data such as X-rays and digital scans plays a pivotal role in shaping treatment decisions. This fusion of technology with clinical expertise creates a dynamic interplay that not only enhances diagnostic precision but also tailors treatment plans to the unique needs of each patient.
X-rays, a traditional yet indispensable tool, provide orthodontists with a glimpse into the internal structures of the jaw and teeth. These images reveal critical information about tooth alignment, root positioning, and bone density, which are essential for diagnosing underlying issues that may not be visible during a routine examination. For instance, an X-ray can uncover impacted teeth or assess the extent of bone loss, guiding the orthodontist in determining the appropriate course of action.
Digital scans, on the other hand, represent a leap forward in orthodontic diagnostics. These scans offer a three-dimensional view of the patient's oral cavity, allowing for a more comprehensive analysis. Technologies like cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans provide detailed images that help in planning complex treatments, such as those involving jaw surgery or intricate tooth movements. Digital scans also facilitate the creation of virtual treatment simulations, enabling both the orthodontist and the patient to visualize potential outcomes before any procedures are undertaken.
However, while diagnostic data is incredibly valuable, it is essential to balance this information with clinical judgment. Orthodontists must interpret these data points within the context of the patient's overall health, lifestyle, and aesthetic goals. For example, a digital scan might indicate a severe misalignment, but the orthodontist must also consider the patient's age, compliance with treatment, and personal preferences when recommending a treatment plan.
Moreover, the human element cannot be overlooked. Clinical judgment involves the orthodontist's experience, intuition, and ability to communicate effectively with the patient. This ensures that the treatment plan is not only scientifically sound but also aligns with the patient's expectations and comfort levels.
In conclusion, the examination of diagnostic data such as X-rays and digital scans is a cornerstone of modern orthodontic practice. When combined with clinical judgment, this data-driven approach leads to more informed, personalized, and effective treatment decisions. As technology continues to advance, the challenge will be to maintain this delicate balance, ensuring that every treatment plan is as precise as it is compassionate.
In the evolving field of orthodontics, the integration of data and clinical expertise is crucial for optimal patient outcomes. However, the debate on whether to rely solely on data or clinical expertise presents distinct benefits and limitations.
Relying solely on data in orthodontics offers several advantages. Data-driven approaches allow for evidence-based decision-making, ensuring that treatments are grounded in statistical analysis and proven methodologies. This can lead to more predictable outcomes and reduced variability in treatment plans. Additionally, data can highlight trends and patterns that may not be immediately apparent to clinicians, providing valuable insights into patient demographics, treatment efficacy, and potential complications. The use of technology, such as digital imaging and software algorithms, enhances precision in diagnosis and treatment planning.
However, the limitations of relying exclusively on data are significant. Data can sometimes oversimplify complex cases, failing to capture the nuances and individual variations that are critical in orthodontics. Patients are not merely sets of data points; they are unique individuals with specific needs, preferences, and biological responses. Clinical expertise allows orthodontists to exercise judgment, adapt to unforeseen circumstances, and provide personalized care that data alone cannot offer. Experienced clinicians can interpret data within the context of their broader knowledge and intuition, leading to more holistic and patient-centered treatment plans.
On the other hand, relying solely on clinical expertise has its own set of benefits and drawbacks. The expertise of a seasoned orthodontist is invaluable, particularly in handling complex cases that defy standard protocols. Clinical judgment allows for flexibility and creativity in treatment approaches, ensuring that each patient receives care tailored to their specific situation. Moreover, the interpersonal skills and communication abilities of clinicians play a crucial role in building trust and rapport with patients, which is essential for successful outcomes.
Nevertheless, the limitations of relying solely on clinical expertise are evident. Without the support of data, decisions may be subjective and prone to bias. Variability in treatment outcomes can arise, as different clinicians may approach the same case differently. Additionally, the rapid advancements in orthodontic technology and research may not be fully integrated into practice, potentially leading to outdated treatment methods.
In conclusion, the ideal approach in orthodontics is a balanced one that harmonizes data with clinical expertise. While data provides a robust foundation for evidence-based practice, clinical expertise ensures that this data is applied thoughtfully and adaptively to meet the unique needs of each patient. This synergy enhances the quality of care, leading to better patient satisfaction and successful treatment outcomes.
Orthodontists face a unique set of challenges when it comes to balancing data and clinical judgment, especially when treating children. This delicate balance is crucial for achieving optimal treatment outcomes and ensuring patient satisfaction. One of the primary challenges is the dynamic nature of growth and development in children. Orthodontic treatment in pediatric patients must account for ongoing changes in the jaw and facial structure, which can complicate the interpretation of diagnostic data. Orthodontists must rely on both empirical evidence and their clinical expertise to predict how a child's teeth and jaws will develop over time.
Another significant challenge is the variability in patient response to treatment. While diagnostic tools and data analytics provide valuable insights, they cannot entirely predict how an individual child will respond to orthodontic intervention. Factors such as genetics, compliance with treatment protocols, and overall health can influence outcomes. Orthodontists must use their clinical judgment to tailor treatment plans to each patient's unique circumstances, often adjusting strategies based on real-time observations and patient feedback.
The integration of technology in orthodontics also presents a dual-edged sword. Advanced imaging techniques, digital impressions, and computer-aided design offer unprecedented precision in diagnosis and treatment planning. However, over-reliance on technology can sometimes lead to a disconnect between the data and the patient's actual clinical presentation. Orthodontists must strike a balance, using data as a guide while also trusting their clinical instincts and experience.
Ethical considerations further complicate this balance. Orthodontists are often faced with decisions that involve trade-offs between immediate data-driven recommendations and long-term clinical outcomes. For instance, a data-driven approach might suggest a more aggressive treatment plan, but clinical judgment might indicate a more conservative approach to avoid potential risks or complications.
Communication with parents and patients is another layer of complexity. Explaining the balance between data and clinical judgment in a way that is understandable and reassuring requires tact and empathy. Parents often seek clear, data-backed assurances, but orthodontists must also convey the nuances and uncertainties inherent in clinical practice.
In conclusion, orthodontists navigating the treatment of children must skillfully balance data and clinical judgment. This involves understanding the limitations and strengths of both, continuously updating their knowledge, and maintaining a patient-centered approach. The goal is to provide the best possible care, tailored to the individual needs and circumstances of each young patient.
In the field of orthodontics, the integration of data and clinical judgment is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes, particularly for young patients. This approach ensures that each treatment plan is both evidence-based and tailored to the individual needs of the patient. Here are several strategies to effectively balance these elements:
Firstly, leveraging advanced diagnostic technologies is essential. Tools such as digital imaging, 3D scans, and software analytics provide orthodontists with precise data about a patient's dental structure and growth patterns. These technologies allow for a more accurate assessment of the patient's condition and help in predicting potential issues before they become problematic.
Secondly, continuous education and training are vital for orthodontists. Staying updated with the latest research and technological advancements ensures that clinical judgments are informed by the most current evidence. Workshops, seminars, and online courses can help professionals refine their skills and integrate new findings into their practice.
Thirdly, personalized treatment plans are key. While data provides a foundation, clinical judgment allows orthodontists to consider the unique aspects of each patient's case. Factors such as the patient's age, growth potential, and specific dental concerns must be taken into account. This personalized approach ensures that treatment is not only effective but also considerate of the patient's overall well-being.
Fourthly, effective communication with patients and their families is crucial. Explaining the rationale behind treatment decisions, supported by data, helps build trust and ensures that patients are comfortable with the proposed plan. It also encourages them to adhere to the treatment process, which is vital for successful outcomes.
Lastly, regular follow-ups and adjustments to the treatment plan are necessary. As young patients grow, their dental needs may change. Orthodontists must be prepared to adapt treatment plans based on ongoing assessments and new data, ensuring that the outcomes remain optimal.
In conclusion, effectively integrating data and clinical judgment in orthodontics requires a combination of technological proficiency, continuous learning, personalized care, clear communication, and adaptability. By embracing these strategies, orthodontists can enhance treatment outcomes and provide the best possible care for their young patients.
Redirect to:
A health professional, healthcare professional, or healthcare worker (sometimes abbreviated HCW)[1] is a provider of health care treatment and advice based on formal training and experience. The field includes those who work as a nurse, physician (such as family physician, internist, obstetrician, psychiatrist, radiologist, surgeon etc.), physician assistant, registered dietitian, veterinarian, veterinary technician, optometrist, pharmacist, pharmacy technician, medical assistant, physical therapist, occupational therapist, dentist, midwife, psychologist, audiologist, or healthcare scientist, or who perform services in allied health professions. Experts in public health and community health are also health professionals.
| Health practitioners and professionals |
|---|
|
The healthcare workforce comprises a wide variety of professions and occupations who provide some type of healthcare service, including such direct care practitioners as physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, respiratory therapists, dentists, pharmacists, speech-language pathologist, physical therapists, occupational therapists, physical and behavior therapists, as well as allied health professionals such as phlebotomists, medical laboratory scientists, dieticians, and social workers. They often work in hospitals, healthcare centers and other service delivery points, but also in academic training, research, and administration. Some provide care and treatment services for patients in private homes. Many countries have a large number of community health workers who work outside formal healthcare institutions. Managers of healthcare services, health information technicians, and other assistive personnel and support workers are also considered a vital part of health care teams.[2]
Healthcare practitioners are commonly grouped into health professions. Within each field of expertise, practitioners are often classified according to skill level and skill specialization. "Health professionals" are highly skilled workers, in professions that usually require extensive knowledge including university-level study leading to the award of a first degree or higher qualification.[3] This category includes physicians, physician assistants, registered nurses, veterinarians, veterinary technicians, veterinary assistants, dentists, midwives, radiographers, pharmacists, physiotherapists, optometrists, operating department practitioners and others. Allied health professionals, also referred to as "health associate professionals" in the International Standard Classification of Occupations, support implementation of health care, treatment and referral plans usually established by medical, nursing, respiratory care, and other health professionals, and usually require formal qualifications to practice their profession. In addition, unlicensed assistive personnel assist with providing health care services as permitted.[citation needed]
Another way to categorize healthcare practitioners is according to the sub-field in which they practice, such as mental health care, pregnancy and childbirth care, surgical care, rehabilitation care, or public health.[citation needed]
A mental health professional is a health worker who offers services to improve the mental health of individuals or treat mental illness. These include psychiatrists, psychiatry physician assistants, clinical, counseling, and school psychologists, occupational therapists, clinical social workers, psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners, marriage and family therapists, mental health counselors, as well as other health professionals and allied health professions. These health care providers often deal with the same illnesses, disorders, conditions, and issues; however, their scope of practice often differs. The most significant difference across categories of mental health practitioners is education and training.[4] There are many damaging effects to the health care workers. Many have had diverse negative psychological symptoms ranging from emotional trauma to very severe anxiety. Health care workers have not been treated right and because of that their mental, physical, and emotional health has been affected by it. The SAGE author's said that there were 94% of nurses that had experienced at least one PTSD after the traumatic experience. Others have experienced nightmares, flashbacks, and short and long term emotional reactions.[5] The abuse is causing detrimental effects on these health care workers. Violence is causing health care workers to have a negative attitude toward work tasks and patients, and because of that they are "feeling pressured to accept the order, dispense a product, or administer a medication".[6] Sometimes it can range from verbal to sexual to physical harassment, whether the abuser is a patient, patient's families, physician, supervisors, or nurses.[citation needed]
A maternal and newborn health practitioner is a health care expert who deals with the care of women and their children before, during and after pregnancy and childbirth. Such health practitioners include obstetricians, physician assistants, midwives, obstetrical nurses and many others. One of the main differences between these professions is in the training and authority to provide surgical services and other life-saving interventions.[7] In some developing countries, traditional birth attendants, or traditional midwives, are the primary source of pregnancy and childbirth care for many women and families, although they are not certified or licensed. According to research, rates for unhappiness among obstetrician-gynecologists (Ob-Gyns) range somewhere between 40 and 75 percent.[8]
A geriatric care practitioner plans and coordinates the care of the elderly and/or disabled to promote their health, improve their quality of life, and maintain their independence for as long as possible.[9] They include geriatricians, occupational therapists, physician assistants, adult-gerontology nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, geriatric clinical pharmacists, geriatric nurses, geriatric care managers, geriatric aides, nursing aides, caregivers and others who focus on the health and psychological care needs of older adults.[citation needed]
A surgical practitioner is a healthcare professional and expert who specializes in the planning and delivery of a patient's perioperative care, including during the anaesthetic, surgical and recovery stages. They may include general and specialist surgeons, physician assistants, assistant surgeons, surgical assistants, veterinary surgeons, veterinary technicians. anesthesiologists, anesthesiologist assistants, nurse anesthetists, surgical nurses, clinical officers, operating department practitioners, anaesthetic technicians, perioperative nurses, surgical technologists, and others.[citation needed]
A rehabilitation care practitioner is a health worker who provides care and treatment which aims to enhance and restore functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. These include physiatrists, physician assistants, rehabilitation nurses, clinical nurse specialists, nurse practitioners, physiotherapists, chiropractors, orthotists, prosthetists, occupational therapists, recreational therapists, audiologists, speech and language pathologists, respiratory therapists, rehabilitation counsellors, physical rehabilitation therapists, athletic trainers, physiotherapy technicians, orthotic technicians, prosthetic technicians, personal care assistants, and others.[10]
Optometry is a field traditionally associated with the correction of refractive errors using glasses or contact lenses, and treating eye diseases. Optometrists also provide general eye care, including screening exams for glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy and management of routine or eye conditions. Optometrists may also undergo further training in order to specialize in various fields, including glaucoma, medical retina, low vision, or paediatrics. In some countries, such as the United Kingdom, United States, and Canada, Optometrists may also undergo further training in order to be able to perform some surgical procedures.
Medical diagnosis providers are health workers responsible for the process of determining which disease or condition explains a person's symptoms and signs. It is most often referred to as diagnosis with the medical context being implicit. This usually involves a team of healthcare providers in various diagnostic units. These include radiographers, radiologists, Sonographers, medical laboratory scientists, pathologists, and related professionals.[citation needed]
A dental care practitioner is a health worker and expert who provides care and treatment to promote and restore oral health. These include dentists and dental surgeons, dental assistants, dental auxiliaries, dental hygienists, dental nurses, dental technicians, dental therapists or oral health therapists, and related professionals.
Care and treatment for the foot, ankle, and lower leg may be delivered by podiatrists, chiropodists, pedorthists, foot health practitioners, podiatric medical assistants, podiatric nurse and others.
A public health practitioner focuses on improving health among individuals, families and communities through the prevention and treatment of diseases and injuries, surveillance of cases, and promotion of healthy behaviors. This category includes community and preventive medicine specialists, physician assistants, public health nurses, pharmacist, clinical nurse specialists, dietitians, environmental health officers (public health inspectors), paramedics, epidemiologists, public health dentists, and others.[citation needed]
In many societies, practitioners of alternative medicine have contact with a significant number of people, either as integrated within or remaining outside the formal health care system. These include practitioners in acupuncture, Ayurveda, herbalism, homeopathy, naturopathy, Reiki, Shamballa Reiki energy healing Archived 2021-01-25 at the Wayback Machine, Siddha medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, traditional Korean medicine, Unani, and Yoga. In some countries such as Canada, chiropractors and osteopaths (not to be confused with doctors of osteopathic medicine in the United States) are considered alternative medicine practitioners.
The healthcare workforce faces unique health and safety challenges and is recognized by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) as a priority industry sector in the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) to identify and provide intervention strategies regarding occupational health and safety issues.[11]
Exposure to respiratory infectious diseases like tuberculosis (caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis) and influenza can be reduced with the use of respirators; this exposure is a significant occupational hazard for health care professionals.[12] Healthcare workers are also at risk for diseases that are contracted through extended contact with a patient, including scabies.[13] Health professionals are also at risk for contracting blood-borne diseases like hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV/AIDS through needlestick injuries or contact with bodily fluids.[14][15] This risk can be mitigated with vaccination when there is a vaccine available, like with hepatitis B.[15] In epidemic situations, such as the 2014-2016 West African Ebola virus epidemic or the 2003 SARS outbreak, healthcare workers are at even greater risk, and were disproportionately affected in both the Ebola and SARS outbreaks.[16]
In general, appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) is the first-line mode of protection for healthcare workers from infectious diseases. For it to be effective against highly contagious diseases, personal protective equipment must be watertight and prevent the skin and mucous membranes from contacting infectious material. Different levels of personal protective equipment created to unique standards are used in situations where the risk of infection is different. Practices such as triple gloving and multiple respirators do not provide a higher level of protection and present a burden to the worker, who is additionally at increased risk of exposure when removing the PPE. Compliance with appropriate personal protective equipment rules may be difficult in certain situations, such as tropical environments or low-resource settings. A 2020 Cochrane systematic review found low-quality evidence that using more breathable fabric in PPE, double gloving, and active training reduce the risk of contamination but that more randomized controlled trials are needed for how best to train healthcare workers in proper PPE use.[16]
Based on recommendations from The United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for TB screening and testing the following best practices should be followed when hiring and employing Health Care Personnel.[17]
When hiring Health Care Personnel, the applicant should complete the following:[18] a TB risk assessment,[19] a TB symptom evaluation for at least those listed on the Signs & Symptoms page,[20] a TB test in accordance with the guidelines for Testing for TB Infection,[21] and additional evaluation for TB disease as needed (e.g. chest x-ray for HCP with a positive TB test)[18] The CDC recommends either a blood test, also known as an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), or a skin test, also known as a Mantoux tuberculin skin test (TST).[21] A TB blood test for baseline testing does not require two-step testing. If the skin test method is used to test HCP upon hire, then two-step testing should be used. A one-step test is not recommended.[18]
The CDC has outlined further specifics on recommended testing for several scenarios.[22] In summary:
According to these recommended testing guidelines any two negative TST results within 12 months of each other constitute a two-step TST.
For annual screening, testing, and education, the only recurring requirement for all HCP is to receive TB education annually.[18] While the CDC offers education materials, there is not a well defined requirement as to what constitutes a satisfactory annual education. Annual TB testing is no longer recommended unless there is a known exposure or ongoing transmission at a healthcare facility. Should an HCP be considered at increased occupational risk for TB annual screening may be considered. For HCP with a documented history of a positive TB test result do not need to be re-tested but should instead complete a TB symptom evaluation. It is assumed that any HCP who has undergone a chest x-ray test has had a previous positive test result. When considering mental health you may see your doctor to be evaluated at your digression. It is recommended to see someone at least once a year in order to make sure that there has not been any sudden changes.[23]
Occupational stress and occupational burnout are highly prevalent among health professionals.[24] Some studies suggest that workplace stress is pervasive in the health care industry because of inadequate staffing levels, long work hours, exposure to infectious diseases and hazardous substances leading to illness or death, and in some countries threat of malpractice litigation. Other stressors include the emotional labor of caring for ill people and high patient loads. The consequences of this stress can include substance abuse, suicide, major depressive disorder, and anxiety, all of which occur at higher rates in health professionals than the general working population. Elevated levels of stress are also linked to high rates of burnout, absenteeism and diagnostic errors, and reduced rates of patient satisfaction.[25] In Canada, a national report (Canada's Health Care Providers) also indicated higher rates of absenteeism due to illness or disability among health care workers compared to the rest of the working population, although those working in health care reported similar levels of good health and fewer reports of being injured at work.[26]
There is some evidence that cognitive-behavioral therapy, relaxation training and therapy (including meditation and massage), and modifying schedules can reduce stress and burnout among multiple sectors of health care providers. Research is ongoing in this area, especially with regards to physicians, whose occupational stress and burnout is less researched compared to other health professions.[27]
Healthcare workers are at higher risk of on-the-job injury due to violence. Drunk, confused, and hostile patients and visitors are a continual threat to providers attempting to treat patients. Frequently, assault and violence in a healthcare setting goes unreported and is wrongly assumed to be part of the job.[28] Violent incidents typically occur during one-on-one care; being alone with patients increases healthcare workers' risk of assault.[29] In the United States, healthcare workers experience 2⁄3 of nonfatal workplace violence incidents.[28] Psychiatric units represent the highest proportion of violent incidents, at 40%; they are followed by geriatric units (20%) and the emergency department (10%). Workplace violence can also cause psychological trauma.[29]
Health care professionals are also likely to experience sleep deprivation due to their jobs. Many health care professionals are on a shift work schedule, and therefore experience misalignment of their work schedule and their circadian rhythm. In 2007, 32% of healthcare workers were found to get fewer than 6 hours of sleep a night. Sleep deprivation also predisposes healthcare professionals to make mistakes that may potentially endanger a patient.[30]
Especially in times like the present (2020), the hazards of health professional stem into the mental health. Research from the last few months highlights that COVID-19 has contributed greatly to the degradation of mental health in healthcare providers. This includes, but is not limited to, anxiety, depression/burnout, and insomnia.[citation needed]
A study done by Di Mattei et al. (2020) revealed that 12.63% of COVID nurses and 16.28% of other COVID healthcare workers reported extremely severe anxiety symptoms at the peak of the pandemic.[31] In addition, another study was conducted on 1,448 full time employees in Japan. The participants were surveyed at baseline in March 2020 and then again in May 2020. The result of the study showed that psychological distress and anxiety had increased more among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 outbreak.[32]
Similarly, studies have also shown that following the pandemic, at least one in five healthcare professionals report symptoms of anxiety.[33] Specifically, the aspect of "anxiety was assessed in 12 studies, with a pooled prevalence of 23.2%" following COVID.[33] When considering all 1,448 participants that percentage makes up about 335 people.
Slips, trips, and falls are the second-most common cause of worker's compensation claims in the US and cause 21% of work absences due to injury. These injuries most commonly result in strains and sprains; women, those older than 45, and those who have been working less than a year in a healthcare setting are at the highest risk.[36]
An epidemiological study published in 2018 examined the hearing status of noise-exposed health care and social assistance (HSA) workers sector to estimate and compare the prevalence of hearing loss by subsector within the sector. Most of the HSA subsector prevalence estimates ranged from 14% to 18%, but the Medical and Diagnostic Laboratories subsector had 31% prevalence and the Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners had a 24% prevalence. The Child Day Care Services subsector also had a 52% higher risk than the reference industry.[37]
Exposure to hazardous drugs, including those for chemotherapy, is another potential occupational risk. These drugs can cause cancer and other health conditions.[38]
Female health care workers may face specific types of workplace-related health conditions and stress. According to the World Health Organization, women predominate in the formal health workforce in many countries and are prone to musculoskeletal injury (caused by physically demanding job tasks such as lifting and moving patients) and burnout. Female health workers are exposed to hazardous drugs and chemicals in the workplace which may cause adverse reproductive outcomes such as spontaneous abortion and congenital malformations. In some contexts, female health workers are also subject to gender-based violence from coworkers and patients.[39][40]
Many jurisdictions report shortfalls in the number of trained health human resources to meet population health needs and/or service delivery targets, especially in medically underserved areas. For example, in the United States, the 2010 federal budget invested $330 million to increase the number of physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, nurses, and dentists practicing in areas of the country experiencing shortages of trained health professionals. The Budget expands loan repayment programs for physicians, nurses, and dentists who agree to practice in medically underserved areas. This funding will enhance the capacity of nursing schools to increase the number of nurses. It will also allow states to increase access to oral health care through dental workforce development grants. The Budget's new resources will sustain the expansion of the health care workforce funded in the Recovery Act.[41] There were 15.7 million health care professionals in the US as of 2011.[36]
In Canada, the 2011 federal budget announced a Canada Student Loan forgiveness program to encourage and support new family physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners and nurses to practice in underserved rural or remote communities of the country, including communities that provide health services to First Nations and Inuit populations.[42]
In Uganda, the Ministry of Health reports that as many as 50% of staffing positions for health workers in rural and underserved areas remain vacant. As of early 2011, the Ministry was conducting research and costing analyses to determine the most appropriate attraction and retention packages for medical officers, nursing officers, pharmacists, and laboratory technicians in the country's rural areas.[43]
At the international level, the World Health Organization estimates a shortage of almost 4.3 million doctors, midwives, nurses, and support workers worldwide to meet target coverage levels of essential primary health care interventions.[44] The shortage is reported most severe in 57 of the poorest countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa.
Nurses are the most common type of medical field worker to face shortages around the world. There are numerous reasons that the nursing shortage occurs globally. Some include: inadequate pay, a large percentage of working nurses are over the age of 45 and are nearing retirement age, burnout, and lack of recognition.[45]
Incentive programs have been put in place to aid in the deficit of pharmacists and pharmacy students. The reason for the shortage of pharmacy students is unknown but one can infer that it is due to the level of difficulty in the program.[46]
Results of nursing staff shortages can cause unsafe staffing levels that lead to poor patient care. Five or more incidents that occur per day in a hospital setting as a result of nurses who do not receive adequate rest or meal breaks is a common issue.[47]
Practicing without a license that is valid and current is typically illegal. In most jurisdictions, the provision of health care services is regulated by the government. Individuals found to be providing medical, nursing or other professional services without the appropriate certification or license may face sanctions and criminal charges leading to a prison term. The number of professions subject to regulation, requisites for individuals to receive professional licensure, and nature of sanctions that can be imposed for failure to comply vary across jurisdictions.
In the United States, under Michigan state laws, an individual is guilty of a felony if identified as practicing in the health profession without a valid personal license or registration. Health professionals can also be imprisoned if found guilty of practicing beyond the limits allowed by their licenses and registration. The state laws define the scope of practice for medicine, nursing, and a number of allied health professions.[48][unreliable source?] In Florida, practicing medicine without the appropriate license is a crime classified as a third degree felony,[49] which may give imprisonment up to five years. Practicing a health care profession without a license which results in serious bodily injury classifies as a second degree felony,[49] providing up to 15 years' imprisonment.
In the United Kingdom, healthcare professionals are regulated by the state; the UK Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) protects the 'title' of each profession it regulates. For example, it is illegal for someone to call himself an Occupational Therapist or Radiographer if they are not on the register held by the HCPC.
cite journal: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
|
|
| Professions |
|
| Settings |
|
| Care |
|
| Skills / training |
|
| Technology |
|
| Health informatics |
|
| By country |
|
|
|
| Authority control databases: National |
|
|---|
