The Role of CBCT in Complex Orthodontic Cases

The Role of CBCT in Complex Orthodontic Cases

Explanation of what brackets are in orthodontics and their function in aligning teeth.

Certainly! Here's a short essay on the topic "Overview of complex orthodontic cases in children and the challenges they present" with a focus on "The Role of CBCT in Complex Orthodontic Cases":




Orthodontic treatment in children often presents unique challenges, especially when dealing with complex cases. These cases may involve severe malocclusions, impacted teeth, craniofacial abnormalities, or a combination of these issues. Crowded or crooked teeth can be corrected with braces or aligners Braces for kids and teens patient. Addressing these complexities requires a detailed understanding of the patient's dental and skeletal structures, which is where Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) plays a crucial role.


Complex orthodontic cases in children are particularly challenging due to the dynamic nature of growth and development. Unlike adult patients, children's jaws and teeth are constantly changing, which can complicate diagnosis and treatment planning. Additionally, young patients may have mixed dentition, where both primary and permanent teeth are present, adding another layer of complexity to the orthodontic assessment.


One of the primary challenges in treating complex orthodontic cases is accurately diagnosing the underlying issues. Traditional two-dimensional radiographs, such as panoramic and cephalometric X-rays, often provide limited information. They can fail to capture the full extent of three-dimensional relationships between teeth, roots, and surrounding bone structures. This is where CBCT imaging becomes invaluable.


CBCT offers a three-dimensional view of the craniofacial structures, allowing orthodontists to gain a comprehensive understanding of the patient's anatomy. This detailed imaging helps in identifying impacted teeth, assessing root resorption, evaluating the position of unerupted teeth, and understanding the relationship between teeth and the surrounding bone. Such detailed diagnostics are essential for formulating an effective treatment plan.


Moreover, CBCT imaging aids in monitoring the progress of orthodontic treatment. For instance, it can help orthodontists evaluate the movement of teeth in three dimensions, ensuring that the treatment is on track and making necessary adjustments if needed. This is particularly beneficial in complex cases where precision is key to achieving successful outcomes.


Another significant advantage of CBCT in complex orthodontic cases is its ability to aid in interdisciplinary collaboration. Often, complex cases require input from various dental specialists, such as oral surgeons, periodontists, and prosthodontists. CBCT images provide a common ground for these professionals to discuss and plan comprehensive treatment strategies.


In conclusion, the role of CBCT in managing complex orthodontic cases in children cannot be overstated. It offers unparalleled diagnostic capabilities, aids in precise treatment planning, and facilitates better interdisciplinary communication. As technology continues to advance, the integration of CBCT in orthodontics promises to enhance the quality of care provided to young patients with complex dental issues.

Certainly!


The integration of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) into orthodontic practices has revolutionized the way we approach complex cases. CBCT technology stands out for its ability to deliver highly detailed three-dimensional images of the teeth, jaw, and surrounding structures. This capability is crucial in orthodontics, where understanding the spatial relationships between teeth and jawbones can significantly impact treatment planning and outcomes.


At its core, CBCT operates by sweeping an X-ray beam around the patient's head, capturing multiple images from different angles. These images are then reconstructed by sophisticated software to create a three-dimensional model. This model allows orthodontists to view the anatomy in unprecedented detail, from any angle, and at various depths. Unlike traditional two-dimensional X-rays, CBCT scans provide a complete picture of the dental and skeletal structures, eliminating the guesswork that often accompanies complex cases.


The detailed images offered by CBCT are particularly beneficial in diagnosing and treating cases that involve impacted teeth, jaw discrepancies, or complex root structures. For instance, in cases of impacted wisdom teeth, CBCT scans can reveal the exact position of the teeth relative to nerves and other critical structures, guiding the surgeon in planning a safe extraction. Similarly, for patients with jaw misalignments, CBCT scans help in assessing the severity of the condition and in designing a tailored treatment plan that may involve orthodontics, surgery, or a combination of both.


Furthermore, CBCT's ability to provide a comprehensive view of the airway can be invaluable in cases where orthodontic treatment is considered for patients with sleep apnea or other respiratory issues. By visualizing the airway's dimensions and identifying any obstructions, orthodontists can make informed decisions about the most appropriate treatment approach.


In summary, the role of CBCT in complex orthodontic cases cannot be overstated. Its ability to provide detailed, three-dimensional images of the teeth, jaw, and surrounding structures enables orthodontists to diagnose more accurately, plan treatments more effectively, and ultimately achieve better outcomes for their patients. As technology continues to advance, the integration of CBCT into orthodontic practice will likely become even more essential, further enhancing the precision and success of orthodontic treatments.

More about us:

Social Media:

Facebook About Us:


Citations and other links

Overview of the process of attaching brackets to teeth and how they work with archwires to move teeth into proper alignment.

Certainly! Here's a short essay on the benefits of using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in diagnosing and planning treatment for complex orthodontic cases in children:




In the field of orthodontics, the introduction of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has revolutionized the way we diagnose and plan treatment for complex cases, especially in children. CBCT offers a multitude of benefits that traditional two-dimensional imaging methods simply cannot match.


First and foremost, CBCT provides unparalleled three-dimensional imaging of the craniofacial structures. This allows orthodontists to obtain a comprehensive view of the patient's dental and skeletal anatomy. For children with complex orthodontic issues, such as severe malocclusions, impacted teeth, or asymmetries, this detailed visualization is crucial. It enables clinicians to identify underlying problems that might not be apparent on standard X-rays, leading to more accurate diagnoses and tailored treatment plans.


Another significant advantage of CBCT is its ability to aid in the early detection of developmental abnormalities. In growing children, timely identification of issues such as supernumerary teeth, root resorption, or jaw discrepancies can make a substantial difference in treatment outcomes. Early intervention can often lead to less invasive and more effective orthodontic solutions, minimizing the need for future corrective surgeries.


CBCT also plays a vital role in treatment planning. By providing detailed images of the teeth, roots, and surrounding bone, orthodontists can plan the precise placement of orthodontic appliances and predict potential complications. This is particularly important in cases where extractions or surgical interventions are necessary. The ability to simulate treatment outcomes helps in communicating more effectively with patients and their families, setting realistic expectations, and ensuring informed consent.


Moreover, CBCT reduces the margin of error in complex orthodontic treatments. The detailed imaging allows for more accurate assessments of tooth movement and root proximity, which is critical in avoiding nerve damage and ensuring the stability of the final outcome. This precision is especially beneficial in growing children, whose developing bones and teeth require careful management.


Lastly, the use of CBCT in orthodontics contributes to ongoing research and education. By providing high-quality images, it allows for better documentation and analysis of treatment progress and outcomes. This, in turn, helps in refining techniques and improving future treatments for complex orthodontic cases in children.


In conclusion, the integration of CBCT into orthodontic practice offers numerous benefits for diagnosing and planning treatment in complex cases involving children. Its three-dimensional imaging capabilities, early detection of abnormalities, enhanced treatment planning, reduced errors, and contribution to research make it an invaluable tool in modern orthodontics. As technology continues to advance, the role of CBCT in ensuring optimal orthodontic outcomes for young patients will only become more significant.

Benefits of using brackets in orthodontic treatment for kids, such as improved dental health, aesthetics, and self-esteem.

Certainly!


In the evolving landscape of orthodontics, the integration of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has marked a significant leap forward, especially in addressing intricate orthodontic challenges in pediatric patients. This advanced imaging technology offers detailed, three-dimensional views of the dental and skeletal structures, enabling orthodontists to devise more precise and effective treatment plans. Let's delve into a few case studies that exemplify the successful application of CBCT in treating complex orthodontic issues in young patients.


Consider the case of a 10-year-old patient presenting with a severe Class III malocclusion, characterized by an underbite where the lower teeth significantly overlap the upper teeth. Traditional two-dimensional imaging methods would have provided limited insight into the underlying skeletal discrepancies. However, the implementation of CBCT allowed for a comprehensive assessment of the jawbones' alignment and the relationship between the teeth and the supporting structures. This detailed visualization facilitated a tailored treatment approach, combining orthodontic appliances with strategic growth modification techniques. Over the course of treatment, the CBCT scans were instrumental in monitoring the progress and making necessary adjustments, ultimately leading to a successful correction of the malocclusion and a harmonious facial profile.


Another compelling example involves an 11-year-old patient with a complex case of impacted canines, where these crucial teeth failed to emerge into their proper positions. The situation was further complicated by the proximity of the impacted canines to adjacent teeth roots, raising concerns about potential damage. CBCT imaging played a pivotal role in this scenario by providing clear, three-dimensional images that allowed the orthodontist to precisely map out the impacted teeth's positions and their relationships with the surrounding dental structures. This detailed mapping was crucial in planning a safe and effective surgical exposure and orthodontic alignment of the canines, minimizing the risk of damage to adjacent teeth and ensuring a successful outcome.


These case studies underscore the invaluable role of CBCT in complex orthodontic treatments for pediatric patients. By offering unparalleled insights into the three-dimensional dental and skeletal landscapes, CBCT enables orthodontists to tackle even the most challenging cases with greater confidence and precision. As technology continues to advance, the integration of CBCT in orthodontic practice promises to enhance treatment outcomes, ensuring brighter smiles and healthier futures for young patients around the world.

Potential challenges or considerations when using brackets for children, including comfort, maintenance, and compliance with treatment.

When considering the use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in children for complex orthodontic cases, it's essential to weigh the potential risks and limitations, particularly concerning radiation exposure. CBCT scans provide detailed three-dimensional images which are incredibly beneficial for diagnosing and planning treatment in intricate orthodontic scenarios. However, the increased use of this technology in pediatric patients raises several concerns.


Firstly, radiation exposure is a significant issue. Although CBCT emits lower radiation doses compared to traditional CT scans, it's still a form of ionizing radiation, which can pose health risks, especially to growing bodies. Children are more sensitive to the effects of radiation, and repeated exposure can increase the risk of developing cancer later in life. Therefore, it's crucial to limit the use of CBCT to cases where it is absolutely necessary and where the benefits outweigh the risks.


Another limitation is the lack of standardized guidelines for CBCT use in children. Without clear protocols, there's a risk of over-reliance on imaging, leading to unnecessary radiation exposure. It's important for dental professionals to carefully evaluate each case and consider alternative, less invasive imaging methods whenever possible.


Additionally, the interpretation of CBCT images requires a high level of expertise. Misinterpretation can lead to incorrect diagnoses and inappropriate treatment plans, which can be particularly detrimental in pediatric cases where the growth and development of dental structures are critical.


Lastly, the cost and accessibility of CBCT technology can be a barrier. Not all orthodontic practices have access to CBCT machines, and the cost of the scans can be prohibitive for some families, potentially leading to unequal access to advanced diagnostic tools.


In conclusion, while CBCT is a valuable tool in complex orthodontic cases, its use in children must be approached with caution. Balancing the benefits of detailed imaging against the risks of radiation exposure and other limitations is crucial for ensuring the health and well-being of young patients.

Tips for parents on how to care for their child's brackets and maintain oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment.

When it comes to diagnosing and planning treatments in complex orthodontic cases, the precision and detail of imaging techniques play a crucial role. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has emerged as a transformative tool in this domain, offering a host of advantages over traditional imaging methods such as panoramic radiographs and cephalometric films. Let's delve into a comparison of CBCT with these conventional methods in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and patient comfort.


Firstly, accuracy is paramount in orthodontics, where even minor discrepancies can lead to significant treatment challenges. CBCT scans provide a three-dimensional view of the dentomaxillofacial region, allowing orthodontists to assess the precise position of teeth, roots, and jaw bones with unparalleled clarity. This level of detail is often unattainable with traditional two-dimensional imaging methods, which can suffer from superimposition and distortion. The enhanced accuracy of CBCT enables more reliable diagnosis and treatment planning, especially in cases involving impacted teeth, root resorption, or complex jaw discrepancies.


Efficiency is another area where CBCT outperforms traditional imaging techniques. While panoramic and cephalometric radiographs require multiple exposures and can be time-consuming to interpret, a single CBCT scan captures comprehensive data in a fraction of the time. This not only streamlines the diagnostic process but also allows for immediate assessment and quicker decision-making. Moreover, the digital nature of CBCT images facilitates easy storage, retrieval, and sharing among dental professionals, enhancing collaboration and continuity of care.


Patient comfort is a critical consideration, particularly in orthodontics, where patients often require multiple imaging sessions throughout their treatment. Traditional radiographs, while generally safe, involve exposure to ionizing radiation and may require uncomfortable positioning. CBCT, on the other hand, offers a more patient-friendly experience. Modern CBCT machines are designed to minimize radiation exposure while providing high-quality images. Additionally, the quick scanning process reduces the time patients spend in uncomfortable positions, enhancing overall comfort and compliance with imaging protocols.


In conclusion, the comparison of CBCT with traditional imaging methods highlights the significant advantages offered by CBCT in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and patient comfort. As orthodontic cases become increasingly complex, the role of CBCT in diagnosis and treatment planning is poised to grow, offering orthodontists the tools they need to achieve optimal outcomes for their patients.

Future directions and advancements in CBCT technology promise to significantly enhance its role in pediatric orthodontics. As this imaging modality becomes more integrated into clinical practice, several key developments are anticipated that could transform how complex orthodontic cases are managed in young patients.


Firstly, there is an ongoing effort to reduce radiation exposure associated with CBCT scans. This is particularly crucial in pediatric populations where minimizing radiation is paramount. Advances in image processing algorithms and hardware improvements are expected to lower the radiation dose without compromising image quality. This would make CBCT a safer option for repeated use in monitoring treatment progress in children.


Secondly, the integration of CBCT with other digital technologies, such as intraoral scanners and 3D printing, is poised to revolutionize treatment planning and execution. By creating comprehensive digital models of a patient's dentition and craniofacial structure, orthodontists can simulate treatment outcomes more accurately. This allows for personalized treatment plans that are tailored to the unique anatomy of each child, potentially reducing treatment time and improving results.


Another exciting prospect is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in conjunction with CBCT imaging. AI algorithms can analyze CBCT data to identify patterns and predict outcomes, assisting orthodontists in making more informed decisions. For instance, AI could help in early detection of potential complications or in optimizing the placement of orthodontic appliances for better efficacy.


Furthermore, the development of portable CBCT devices could facilitate easier access to this technology, especially in remote or underserved areas. This would ensure that more children have the opportunity to benefit from advanced imaging techniques, regardless of their geographic location.


Lastly, ongoing research into the biomechanical responses of growing craniofacial structures to orthodontic forces, as visualized through CBCT, could lead to more effective and less invasive treatment strategies. Understanding these responses at a deeper level will enable orthodontists to harness the full potential of CBCT in guiding treatment for complex cases in pediatric patients.


In conclusion, the future of CBCT in pediatric orthodontics is bright, with numerous advancements on the horizon that will likely enhance its utility in managing complex cases. By focusing on reducing radiation, integrating with other digital technologies, leveraging AI, improving accessibility, and deepening our understanding of biomechanical responses, CBCT is set to play an even more pivotal role in delivering exceptional orthodontic care to children.

Dental braces

Dental braces (also known as orthodontic braces, or simply braces) are devices used in orthodontics that align and straighten teeth and help position them with regard to a person's bite, while also aiming to improve dental health. They are often used to correct underbites, as well as malocclusions, overbites, open bites, gaps, deep bites, cross bites, crooked teeth, and various other flaws of the teeth and jaw. Braces can be either cosmetic or structural. Dental braces are often used in conjunction with other orthodontic appliances to help widen the palate or jaws and to otherwise assist in shaping the teeth and jaws.

Process

[edit]

The application of braces moves the teeth as a result of force and pressure on the teeth. Traditionally, four basic elements are used: brackets, bonding material, arch wire, and ligature elastic (also called an "O-ring"). The teeth move when the arch wire puts pressure on the brackets and teeth. Sometimes springs or rubber bands are used to put more force in a specific direction.[1]

Braces apply constant pressure which, over time, moves teeth into the desired positions. The process loosens the tooth after which new bone grows to support the tooth in its new position. This is called bone remodelling. Bone remodelling is a biomechanical process responsible for making bones stronger in response to sustained load-bearing activity and weaker in the absence of carrying a load. Bones are made of cells called osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Two different kinds of bone resorption are possible: direct resorption, which starts from the lining cells of the alveolar bone, and indirect or retrograde resorption, which occurs when the periodontal ligament has been subjected to an excessive amount and duration of compressive stress.[2] Another important factor associated with tooth movement is bone deposition. Bone deposition occurs in the distracted periodontal ligament. Without bone deposition, the tooth will loosen, and voids will occur distal to the direction of tooth movement.[3]

Types

[edit]
"Clear" braces
Upper and Lower Jaw Functional Expanders
  • Traditional metal wired braces (also known as "train track braces") are stainless-steel and are sometimes used in combination with titanium. Traditional metal braces are the most common type of braces.[4] These braces have a metal bracket with elastic ties (also known as rubber bands) holding the wire onto the metal brackets. The second-most common type of braces is self-ligating braces, which have a built-in system to secure the archwire to the brackets and do not require elastic ties. Instead, the wire goes through the bracket. Often with this type of braces, treatment time is reduced, there is less pain on the teeth, and fewer adjustments are required than with traditional braces.
  • Gold-plated stainless steel braces are often employed for patients allergic to nickel (a basic and important component of stainless steel), but may also be chosen for aesthetic reasons.
  • Lingual braces are a cosmetic alternative in which custom-made braces are bonded to the back of the teeth making them externally invisible.
  • Titanium braces resemble stainless-steel braces but are lighter and just as strong. People with allergies to nickel in steel often choose titanium braces, but they are more expensive than stainless steel braces.
  • Customized orthodontic treatment systems combine high technology including 3-D imaging, treatment planning software and a robot to custom bend the wire. Customized systems such as this offer faster treatment times and more efficient results.[5]
  • Progressive, clear removable aligners may be used to gradually move teeth into their final positions. Aligners are generally not used for complex orthodontic cases, such as when extractions, jaw surgery, or palate expansion are necessary.[medical citation needed][6]

Fitting procedure

[edit]
A patient's teeth are prepared for the application of braces.

Orthodontic services may be provided by any licensed dentist trained in orthodontics. In North America, most orthodontic treatment is done by orthodontists, who are dentists in the diagnosis and treatment of malocclusions—malalignments of the teeth, jaws, or both. A dentist must complete 2–3 years of additional post-doctoral training to earn a specialty certificate in orthodontics. There are many general practitioners who also provide orthodontic services.

The first step is to determine whether braces are suitable for the patient. The doctor consults with the patient and inspects the teeth visually. If braces are appropriate, a records appointment is set up where X-rays, moulds, and impressions are made. These records are analyzed to determine the problems and the proper course of action. The use of digital models is rapidly increasing in the orthodontic industry. Digital treatment starts with the creation of a three-dimensional digital model of the patient's arches. This model is produced by laser-scanning plaster models created using dental impressions. Computer-automated treatment simulation has the ability to automatically separate the gums and teeth from one another and can handle malocclusions well; this software enables clinicians to ensure, in a virtual setting, that the selected treatment will produce the optimal outcome, with minimal user input.[medical citation needed]

Typical treatment times vary from six months to two and a half years depending on the complexity and types of problems. Orthognathic surgery may be required in extreme cases. About 2 weeks before the braces are applied, orthodontic spacers may be required to spread apart back teeth in order to create enough space for the bands.

Teeth to be braced will have an adhesive applied to help the cement bond to the surface of the tooth. In most cases, the teeth will be banded and then brackets will be added. A bracket will be applied with dental cement, and then cured with light until hardened. This process usually takes a few seconds per tooth. If required, orthodontic spacers may be inserted between the molars to make room for molar bands to be placed at a later date. Molar bands are required to ensure brackets will stick. Bands are also utilized when dental fillings or other dental works make securing a bracket to a tooth infeasible. Orthodontic tubes (stainless steel tubes that allow wires to pass through them), also known as molar tubes, are directly bonded to molar teeth either by a chemical curing or a light curing adhesive. Usually, molar tubes are directly welded to bands, which is a metal ring that fits onto the molar tooth. Directly bonded molar tubes are associated with a higher failure rate when compared to molar bands cemented with glass ionomer cement. Failure of orthodontic brackets, bonded tubes or bands will increase the overall treatment time for the patient. There is evidence suggesting that there is less enamel decalcification associated with molar bands cemented with glass ionomer cement compared with orthodontic tubes directly cemented to molars using a light cured adhesive. Further evidence is needed to withdraw a more robust conclusion due to limited data.[7]

An archwire will be threaded between the brackets and affixed with elastic or metal ligatures. Ligatures are available in a wide variety of colours, and the patient can choose which colour they like. Arch wires are bent, shaped, and tightened frequently to achieve the desired results.

Dental braces, with a transparent power chain, removed after completion of treatment.

Modern orthodontics makes frequent use of nickel-titanium archwires and temperature-sensitive materials. When cold, the archwire is limp and flexible, easily threaded between brackets of any configuration. Once heated to body temperature, the arch wire will stiffen and seek to retain its shape, creating constant light force on the teeth.

Brackets with hooks can be placed, or hooks can be created and affixed to the arch wire to affix rubber bands. The placement and configuration of the rubber bands will depend on the course of treatment and the individual patient. Rubber bands are made in different diameters, colours, sizes, and strengths. They are also typically available in two versions: Coloured or clear/opaque.

The fitting process can vary between different types of braces, though there are similarities such as the initial steps of moulding the teeth before application. For example, with clear braces, impressions of a patient's teeth are evaluated to create a series of trays, which fit to the patient's mouth almost like a protective mouthpiece. With some forms of braces, the brackets are placed in a special form that is customized to the patient's mouth, drastically reducing the application time.

In many cases, there is insufficient space in the mouth for all the teeth to fit properly. There are two main procedures to make room in these cases. One is extraction: teeth are removed to create more space. The second is expansion, in which the palate or arch is made larger by using a palatal expander. Expanders can be used with both children and adults. Since the bones of adults are already fused, expanding the palate is not possible without surgery to separate them. An expander can be used on an adult without surgery but would be used to expand the dental arch, and not the palate.

Sometimes children and teenage patients, and occasionally adults, are required to wear a headgear appliance as part of the primary treatment phase to keep certain teeth from moving (for more detail on headgear and facemask appliances see Orthodontic headgear). When braces put pressure on one's teeth, the periodontal membrane stretches on one side and is compressed on the other. This movement needs to be done slowly or otherwise, the patient risks losing their teeth. This is why braces are worn as long as they are and adjustments are only made every so often.

Young Colombian man during an adjustment visit for his orthodontics

Braces are typically adjusted every three to six weeks. This helps shift the teeth into the correct position. When they get adjusted, the orthodontist removes the coloured or metal ligatures keeping the arch wire in place. The arch wire is then removed and may be replaced or modified. When the archwire has been placed back into the mouth, the patient may choose a colour for the new elastic ligatures, which are then affixed to the metal brackets. The adjusting process may cause some discomfort to the patient, which is normal.

Post-treatment

[edit]

Patients may need post-orthodontic surgery, such as a fiberotomy or alternatively a gum lift, to prepare their teeth for retainer use and improve the gumline contours after the braces come off. After braces treatment, patients can use a transparent plate to keep the teeth in alignment for a certain period of time. After treatment, patients usually use transparent plates for 6 months. In patients with long and difficult treatment, a fixative wire is attached to the back of the teeth to prevent the teeth from returning to their original state.[8]

Retainers

[edit]
Hawley retainers are the most common type of retainers. This picture shows retainers for the top (right) and bottom (left) of the mouth.

In order to prevent the teeth from moving back to their original position, retainers are worn once the treatment is complete. Retainers help in maintaining and stabilizing the position of teeth long enough to permit the reorganization of the supporting structures after the active phase of orthodontic therapy. If the patient does not wear the retainer appropriately and/or for the right amount of time, the teeth may move towards their previous position. For regular braces, Hawley retainers are used. They are made of metal hooks that surround the teeth and are enclosed by an acrylic plate shaped to fit the patient's palate. For Clear Removable braces, an Essix retainer is used. This is similar to the original aligner; it is a clear plastic tray that is firmly fitted to the teeth and stays in place without a plate fitted to the palate. There is also a bonded retainer where a wire is permanently bonded to the lingual side of the teeth, usually the lower teeth only.

Headgear

[edit]

Headgear needs to be worn between 12 and 22 hours each day to be effective in correcting the overbite, typically for 12 to 18 months depending on the severity of the overbite, how much it is worn and what growth stage the patient is in. Typically the prescribed daily wear time will be between 14 and 16 hours a day and is frequently used as a post-primary treatment phase to maintain the position of the jaw and arch. Headgear can be used during the night while the patient sleeps.[9][better source needed]

Orthodontic headgear usually consists of three major components:

Full orthodontic headgear with head cap, fitting straps, facebow and elastics
  1. Facebow: the facebow (or J-Hooks) is fitted with a metal arch onto headgear tubes attached to the rear upper and lower molars. This facebow then extends out of the mouth and around the patient's face. J-Hooks are different in that they hook into the patient's mouth and attach directly to the brace (see photo for an example of J-Hooks).
  2. Head cap: the head cap typically consists of one or a number of straps fitting around the patient's head. This is attached with elastic bands or springs to the facebow. Additional straps and attachments are used to ensure comfort and safety (see photo).
  3. Attachment: typically consisting of rubber bands, elastics, or springs—joins the facebow or J-Hooks and the head cap together, providing the force to move the upper teeth, jaw backwards.

The headgear application is one of the most useful appliances available to the orthodontist when looking to correct a Class II malocclusion. See more details in the section Orthodontic headgear.

Pre-finisher

[edit]

The pre-finisher is moulded to the patient's teeth by use of extreme pressure on the appliance by the person's jaw. The product is then worn a certain amount of time with the user applying force to the appliance in their mouth for 10 to 15 seconds at a time. The goal of the process is to increase the exercise time in applying the force to the appliance. If a person's teeth are not ready for a proper retainer the orthodontist may prescribe the use of a preformed finishing appliance such as the pre-finisher. This appliance fixes gaps between the teeth, small spaces between the upper and lower jaw, and other minor problems.

Complications and risks

[edit]

A group of dental researchers, Fatma Boke, Cagri Gazioglu, Selvi Akkaya, and Murat Akkaya, conducted a study titled "Relationship between orthodontic treatment and gingival health." The results indicated that some orthodontist treatments result in gingivitis, also known as gum disease. The researchers concluded that functional appliances used to harness natural forces (such as improving the alignment of bites) do not usually have major effects on the gum after treatment.[10] However, fixed appliances such as braces, which most people get, can result in visible plaque, visible inflammation, and gum recession in a majority of the patients. The formation of plaques around the teeth of patients with braces is almost inevitable regardless of plaque control and can result in mild gingivitis. But if someone with braces does not clean their teeth carefully, plaques will form, leading to more severe gingivitis and gum recession.

Experiencing some pain following fitting and activation of fixed orthodontic braces is very common and several methods have been suggested to tackle this.[11][12] Pain associated with orthodontic treatment increases in proportion to the amount of force that is applied to the teeth. When a force is applied to a tooth via a brace, there is a reduction in the blood supply to the fibres that attach the tooth to the surrounding bone. This reduction in blood supply results in inflammation and the release of several chemical factors, which stimulate the pain response. Orthodontic pain can be managed using pharmacological interventions, which involve the use of analgesics applied locally or systemically. These analgesics are divided into four main categories, including opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), paracetamol and local anesthesia. The first three of these analgesics are commonly taken systemically to reduce orthodontic pain.[13]

A Cochrane Review in 2017 evaluated the pharmacological interventions for pain relief during orthodontic treatment. The study concluded that there was moderate-quality evidence that analgesics reduce the pain associated with orthodontic treatment. However, due to a lack of evidence, it was unclear whether systemic NSAIDs were more effective than paracetamol, and whether topical NSAIDs were more effective than local anaesthesia in the reduction of pain associated with orthodontic treatment. More high-quality research is required to investigate these particular comparisons.[13]

The dental displacement obtained with the orthodontic appliance determines in most cases some degree of root resorption. Only in a few cases is this side effect large enough to be considered real clinical damage to the tooth. In rare cases, the teeth may fall out or have to be extracted due to root resorption.[14][15]

History

[edit]

Ancient

[edit]
Old Braces at a museum in Jbeil, Lebanon

According to scholars and historians, braces date back to ancient times. Around 400–300 BC, Hippocrates and Aristotle contemplated ways to straighten teeth and fix various dental conditions. Archaeologists have discovered numerous mummified ancient individuals with what appear to be metal bands wrapped around their teeth. Catgut, a type of cord made from the natural fibres of an animal's intestines, performed a similar role to today's orthodontic wire in closing gaps in the teeth and mouth.[16]

The Etruscans buried their dead with dental appliances in place to maintain space and prevent the collapse of the teeth during the afterlife. A Roman tomb was found with a number of teeth bound with gold wire documented as a ligature wire, a small elastic wire that is used to affix the arch wire to the bracket. Even Cleopatra wore a pair. Roman philosopher and physician Aulus Cornelius Celsus first recorded the treatment of teeth by finger pressure. Unfortunately, due to a lack of evidence, poor preservation of bodies, and primitive technology, little research was carried out on dental braces until around the 17th century, although dentistry was making great advancements as a profession by then.[citation needed]

18th century

[edit]
Portrait of Fauchard from his 1728 edition of "The Surgical Dentist".

Orthodontics truly began developing in the 18th and 19th centuries. In 1669, French dentist Pierre Fauchard, who is often credited with inventing modern orthodontics, published a book entitled "The Surgeon Dentist" on methods of straightening teeth. Fauchard, in his practice, used a device called a "Bandeau", a horseshoe-shaped piece of iron that helped expand the palate. In 1754, another French dentist, Louis Bourdet, dentist to the King of France, followed Fauchard's book with The Dentist's Art, which also dedicated a chapter to tooth alignment and application. He perfected the "Bandeau" and was the first dentist on record to recommend extraction of the premolar teeth to alleviate crowding and improve jaw growth.

19th century

[edit]

Although teeth and palate straightening and/or pulling were used to improve the alignment of remaining teeth and had been practised since early times, orthodontics, as a science of its own, did not really exist until the mid-19th century. Several important dentists helped to advance dental braces with specific instruments and tools that allowed braces to be improved.

In 1819, Christophe François Delabarre introduced the wire crib, which marked the birth of contemporary orthodontics, and gum elastics were first employed by Maynard in 1843. Tucker was the first to cut rubber bands from rubber tubing in 1850. Dentist, writer, artist, and sculptor Norman William Kingsley in 1858 wrote the first article on orthodontics and in 1880, his book, Treatise on Oral Deformities, was published. A dentist named John Nutting Farrar is credited for writing two volumes entitled, A Treatise on the Irregularities of the Teeth and Their Corrections and was the first to suggest the use of mild force at timed intervals to move teeth.

20th century

[edit]

In the early 20th century, Edward Angle devised the first simple classification system for malocclusions, such as Class I, Class II, and so on. His classification system is still used today as a way for dentists to describe how crooked teeth are, what way teeth are pointing, and how teeth fit together. Angle contributed greatly to the design of orthodontic and dental appliances, making many simplifications. He founded the first school and college of orthodontics, organized the American Society of Orthodontia in 1901 which became the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO) in the 1930s, and founded the first orthodontic journal in 1907. Other innovations in orthodontics in the late 19th and early 20th centuries included the first textbook on orthodontics for children, published by J.J. Guilford in 1889, and the use of rubber elastics, pioneered by Calvin S. Case, along with Henry Albert Baker.

Today, space age wires (also known as dental arch wires) are used to tighten braces. In 1959, the Naval Ordnance Laboratory created an alloy of nickel and titanium called Nitinol. NASA further studied the material's physical properties.[17] In 1979, Dr. George Andreasen developed a new method of fixing braces with the use of the Nitinol wires based on their superelasticity. Andreasen used the wire on some patients and later found out that he could use it for the entire treatment. Andreasen then began using the nitinol wires for all his treatments and as a result, dental doctor visits were reduced, the cost of dental treatment was reduced, and patients reported less discomfort.

See also

[edit]
  • Mandibular advancement splint
  • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Orthognathic surgery
  • Prosthodontics
  • Trismus
  • Dental implant

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Dental Braces and Retainers". WebMD. Retrieved 2020-10-30.
  2. ^ Robling, Alexander G.; Castillo, Alesha B.; Turner, Charles H. (2006). "Biomechanical and Molecular Regulation of Bone Remodeling". Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 8: 455–498. doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095721. PMID 16834564.
  3. ^ Toledo SR, Oliveira ID, Okamoto OK, Zago MA, de Seixas Alves MT, Filho RJ, et al. (September 2010). "Bone deposition, bone resorption, and osteosarcoma". Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 28 (9): 1142–1148. doi:10.1002/jor.21120. PMID 20225287. S2CID 22660771.
  4. ^ "Metal Braces for Teeth: Braces Types, Treatment, Cost in India". Clove Dental. Retrieved 2025-02-06.
  5. ^ Saxe, Alana K.; Louie, Lenore J.; Mah, James (2010). "Efficiency and effectiveness of SureSmile". World Journal of Orthodontics. 11 (1): 16–22. PMID 20209172.
  6. ^ Tamer, Ä°pek (December 2019). "Orthodontic Treatment with Clear Aligners and The Scientific Reality Behind Their Marketing: A Literature Review". Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 32 (4): 241–246. doi:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18083. PMC 7018497. PMID 32110470.
  7. ^ Millett DT, Mandall NA, Mattick RC, Hickman J, Glenny AM (February 2017). "Adhesives for bonded molar tubes during fixed brace treatment". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2 (3): CD008236. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008236.pub3. PMC 6464028. PMID 28230910.
  8. ^ Rubie J Patrick (2017). "What About Teeth After Braces?" 2017 – "Health Journal Article" Toothcost Archived 2021-10-18 at the Wayback Machine
  9. ^ Naten, Joshua. "Braces Headgear (Treatments)". toothcost.com. Archived from the original on 19 October 2021.
  10. ^ Boke, Fatma; Gazioglu, Cagri; Akkaya, Sevil; Akkaya, Murat (2014). "Relationship between orthodontic treatment and gingival health: A retrospective study". European Journal of Dentistry. 8 (3): 373–380. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.137651. ISSN 1305-7456. PMC 4144137. PMID 25202219.
  11. ^ Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Hassanzadeh-Azhiri A, Badiee MR, Fekrazad R (March 2014). "The effect of 810-nm low-level laser therapy on pain caused by orthodontic elastomeric separators". Lasers in Medical Science. 29 (2): 559–64. doi:10.1007/s10103-012-1258-1. PMID 23334785. S2CID 25416518.
  12. ^ Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Edini HZ, Badiee MR, Lynch E, Mortazavi A (September 2013). "The analgesic effect of benzocaine mucoadhesive patches on orthodontic pain caused by elastomeric separators, a preliminary study". Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 71 (5): 1168–73. doi:10.3109/00016357.2012.757358. PMID 23301559. S2CID 22561192.
  13. ^ a b Monk AB, Harrison JE, Worthington HV, Teague A (November 2017). "Pharmacological interventions for pain relief during orthodontic treatment". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 11 (12): CD003976. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003976.pub2. PMC 6486038. PMID 29182798.
  14. ^ Artun J, Smale I, Behbehani F, Doppel D, Van't Hof M, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (November 2005). "Apical root resorption six and 12 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy". The Angle Orthodontist. 75 (6): 919–26. PMID 16448232.
  15. ^ Mavragani M, Vergari A, Selliseth NJ, Bøe OE, Wisth PL (December 2000). "A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with a standard edgewise and a straight-wire edgewise technique". European Journal of Orthodontics. 22 (6): 665–74. doi:10.1093/ejo/22.6.665. PMID 11212602.
  16. ^ Wahl N (February 2005). "Orthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 1: Antiquity to the mid-19th century". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 127 (2): 255–9. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.013. PMID 15750547.
  17. ^ "NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)". Spinoff 1979. February 1979. Retrieved 2021-03-02.
[edit]
  • Useful Resources: FAQ and Downloadable eBooks at Orthodontics Australia
  • Orthos Explain: Treatment Options at Orthodontics Australia
  • Media related to Dental braces at Wikimedia Commons

 

Redirect to:

  • Tooth decay
  • From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.