Cephalometric analysis is an essential tool in orthodontics and maxillofacial surgery, providing detailed measurements and evaluations of the craniofacial structures. This analysis helps professionals make informed decisions about treatment plans. There are several types of cephalometric analyses, but two of the most common are lateral cephalometric analysis and posteroanterior (PA) cephalometric analysis.
Lateral cephalometric analysis is a side-view X-ray of the head, typically taken with the patient in a standardized position. This type of analysis is widely used because it offers a clear view of the sagittal relationships between the skull, jaws, and teeth. It helps orthodontists and surgeons assess the anteroposterior dimensions and vertical proportions of the face. Key measurements include the angles and distances between various skeletal and dental landmarks, such as the sella-nasion line, maxillary and mandibular planes, and the position of the incisors relative to these planes. This analysis is crucial for diagnosing issues like overbites, underbites, and discrepancies in jaw growth.
Posteroanterior (PA) cephalometric analysis, on the other hand, is a frontal X-ray of the head. This type of analysis is particularly useful for evaluating the transverse dimensions and symmetry of the face. It allows clinicians to assess the width of the maxillary and mandibular arches, the position of the zygomatic bones, and the symmetry of the orbital rims and nasal cavity. PA cephalometrics are especially valuable in cases where there are concerns about facial asymmetry or transverse discrepancies, such as crossbites.
Both types of cephalometric analyses provide complementary information that, when combined, offer a comprehensive view of the patient's craniofacial structure. This holistic approach enables more accurate diagnosis and tailored treatment plans, whether for orthodontic corrections, surgical interventions, or a combination of both. By understanding the unique contributions of lateral and PA cephalometric analyses, practitioners can make better-informed decisions that lead to more successful and satisfying outcomes for their patients.
In the realm of orthodontics, cephalometric analysis stands as a pivotal tool for devising effective treatment plans for children. This method involves a detailed study of various landmarks and measurements on a lateral cephalogram, a specialized X-ray of the head. Understanding these landmarks and measurements is crucial for orthodontists as they navigate the complexities of dental and skeletal relationships in growing patients.
One of the primary landmarks is the Sella (S), which is the center of the pituitary fossa in the sphenoid bone. This point serves as a stable reference for other measurements. Another critical landmark is the Nasion (N), the most anterior point on the frontonasal suture. These two points, along with others like the A-point (the deepest midline point on the premaxilla) and the B-point (the deepest point on the mandibular symphysis), help in assessing the anteroposterior relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
The measurement of angles such as the SNA (angle formed by S, N, and A) and SNB (angle formed by S, N, and B) is fundamental. These angles provide insights into the position of the maxilla and mandible relative to the cranial base, respectively. A discrepancy in these angles can indicate a skeletal class II or class III malocclusion, guiding the orthodontist in determining the appropriate treatment approach.
Additionally, the ANB angle (difference between SNA and SNB) is a crucial indicator of the anteroposterior jaw relationship. A positive ANB angle suggests a class II relationship, where the maxilla is ahead of the mandible, whereas a negative ANB angle indicates a class III relationship, with the mandible ahead of the maxilla.
The assessment of vertical dimensions is equally important. Measurements like the Frankfort Horizontal (FH) plane to Mandibular Plane Angle (FMA) help in evaluating the vertical growth pattern of the mandible. A steep FMA suggests a vertical growth pattern, which can influence treatment planning, especially in terms of growth modification.
In conclusion, the discussion of cephalometric landmarks and measurements is indispensable in orthodontic treatment planning for children. These analyses provide a comprehensive understanding of the patient's craniofacial structure, enabling orthodontists to make informed decisions and deliver tailored treatments that address the unique needs of each young patient.
Cephalometric analysis serves as a critical tool in the field of orthodontics, providing invaluable insights into the diagnosis of malocclusions and the formulation of tailored treatment strategies for children. This diagnostic method involves taking standardized X-ray images of the head, which are then analyzed to measure various angles, distances, and relationships between the teeth, jaws, and skull. By quantifying these parameters, orthodontists can assess the extent and nature of malocclusions, which are misalignments of the teeth and jaws that can affect both the aesthetics and functionality of a child's bite.
One of the primary benefits of cephalometric analysis is its ability to offer a comprehensive view of a patient's craniofacial structure. This detailed analysis helps in identifying underlying skeletal discrepancies that may not be apparent through a clinical examination alone. For instance, it can reveal whether a malocclusion is due to a skeletal issue, such as an underdeveloped jaw, or a dental issue, like crowded teeth. This distinction is crucial because it influences the type of treatment that will be most effective.
In planning treatment strategies, cephalometric analysis allows for a more precise and personalized approach. By understanding the specific dimensions and relationships within a child's craniofacial structure, orthodontists can predict how different treatment modalities, such as braces, aligners, or even surgical interventions, will impact the overall facial harmony and dental function. This predictive capability ensures that the chosen treatment not only corrects the malocclusion but also enhances the child's long-term oral health and quality of life.
Moreover, cephalometric analysis facilitates better communication between the orthodontist and the patient's family. By visualizing the existing problems and the anticipated outcomes of various treatments, families can make informed decisions about their child's orthodontic care. This transparency fosters a collaborative environment, where the orthodontist and the family work together to achieve the best possible results.
In conclusion, cephalometric analysis is an indispensable component in the diagnosis and treatment planning for malocclusions in children. Its detailed and quantitative approach enables orthodontists to deliver more effective and personalized care, ultimately leading to improved treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction. As technology advances, the integration of digital cephalometric analysis promises even greater accuracy and efficiency in orthodontic practice, further enhancing the quality of care provided to young patients.
Cephalometric analysis is a critical tool in orthodontics, especially when it comes to making informed treatment decisions for children. This method involves taking X-ray images of the head to measure various angles and relationships between the teeth, jaw, and skull. It provides orthodontists with valuable data that can significantly enhance the quality of care provided. However, like any diagnostic tool, it comes with its own set of benefits and limitations.
One of the primary benefits of cephalometric analysis is its ability to provide a detailed and objective assessment of a child's craniofacial structure. This allows orthodontists to diagnose issues such as malocclusions, jaw discrepancies, and abnormal growth patterns more accurately. With this information, orthodontists can develop customized treatment plans that are tailored to the specific needs of each patient. This level of precision can lead to more effective and efficient treatments, reducing the need for adjustments and prolonging the treatment timeline.
Another advantage is the ability to monitor progress over time. By taking periodic cephalometric X-rays, orthodontists can track changes in the patient's craniofacial structure as treatment progresses. This ongoing assessment allows for timely adjustments to the treatment plan, ensuring that the child remains on the right path toward a healthy, well-aligned smile.
However, cephalometric analysis is not without its limitations. One significant concern is the exposure to radiation, albeit minimal, associated with X-ray imaging. While the benefits generally outweigh the risks, it is crucial to minimize the number of X-rays taken, particularly in children who are more sensitive to radiation. Orthodontists must balance the need for detailed diagnostic information with the principle of "as low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA) radiation exposure.
Another limitation is the interpretation of cephalometric data. The analysis requires a high level of expertise to accurately measure and interpret the various angles and relationships. Misinterpretation can lead to incorrect diagnoses and, consequently, inappropriate treatment plans. Therefore, it is essential that orthodontists are well-trained and experienced in cephalometric analysis.
Additionally, cephalometric analysis provides a two-dimensional representation of a three-dimensional structure. While it offers valuable insights, it may not capture the full complexity of the craniofacial anatomy. Advances in technology, such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), are helping to address this limitation by providing three-dimensional images. However, CBCT comes with its own set of considerations, including higher radiation exposure and cost.
In conclusion, cephalometric analysis is a powerful tool in orthodontics that offers numerous benefits for treatment planning and monitoring in children. However, it is essential to be aware of its limitations, particularly concerning radiation exposure and the need for expert interpretation. By carefully considering these factors, orthodontists can leverage cephalometric analysis to make better-informed treatment decisions, ultimately leading to improved outcomes for their young patients.
In the realm of orthodontics, making informed decisions is paramount to achieving successful treatment outcomes. One tool that has significantly contributed to this process is cephalometric analysis. This method involves taking and analyzing X-ray images of the skull to assess the relationships between the teeth, jaws, and facial structures. By providing detailed insights into a patient's craniofacial anatomy, cephalometric analysis enables orthodontists to tailor treatment plans to individual needs, ultimately leading to better results. To illustrate the practical application and benefits of cephalometric analysis, let's explore a few case studies involving children undergoing orthodontic treatment.
Our first case involves a 10-year-old boy with a pronounced overbite and a Class II skeletal relationship. Through cephalometric analysis, the orthodontist identified significant discrepancies in the jaw positioning. The analysis revealed that the boy's maxilla was excessively protruded relative to his mandible, contributing to his overbite. With this information, the orthodontist designed a treatment plan that included the use of functional appliances to guide jaw growth and correct the skeletal discrepancy. Over the course of two years, regular cephalometric assessments allowed for adjustments to the treatment plan, ensuring that the boy's jaw growth was progressing as intended. The final outcome was a well-aligned bite and a more harmonious facial profile.
In our second case, we follow a 12-year-old girl with a high-angle growth pattern, characterized by an open bite and excessive vertical facial dimensions. Cephalometric analysis played a crucial role in diagnosing her condition by quantifying the vertical relationships between her jaws and teeth. The orthodontist used this data to implement a treatment strategy that included the use of high-pull headgear and vertical-holding appliances to control her vertical growth. Throughout the treatment, cephalometric evaluations were conducted to monitor changes and make necessary adjustments. After three years of treatment, the girl achieved a stable bite with improved facial aesthetics, demonstrating the effectiveness of cephalometric-guided interventions in managing complex growth patterns.
Our final case study focuses on a 9-year-old boy with severe dental crowding and a narrow maxillary arch. Cephalometric analysis revealed that his crowding was not only due to tooth size-arch size discrepancy but also influenced by his jaw's transverse dimensions. Based on these findings, the orthodontist recommended early intervention with a rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliance to create additional space in the upper arch. Cephalometric assessments during the expansion process ensured that the treatment was effective and that the boy's jaw was expanding symmetrically. Following the RME phase, comprehensive orthodontic treatment was initiated, leading to a well-aligned and functional dentition.
These case studies underscore the invaluable role of cephalometric analysis in orthodontic treatment planning and decision-making. By providing precise measurements and insights into a patient's unique craniofacial anatomy, cephalometric analysis enables orthodontists to develop targeted treatment strategies that address the root causes of malocclusions. As a result, patients, especially children, benefit from more effective and efficient orthodontic care, leading to improved treatment outcomes and enhanced quality of life.
A dentist treats a patient with the help of a dental assistant.
|
|
Occupation | |
---|---|
Names |
[1][nb 1] |
Occupation type
|
Profession |
Activity sectors
|
Health care, Anatomy, Physiology, Pathology, Medicine, Pharmacology, Surgery |
Description | |
Competencies | |
Education required
|
Dental Degree |
Fields of
employment |
|
Related jobs
|
ICD-9-CM | 23-24 |
---|---|
MeSH | D003813 |
Dentistry, also known as dental medicine and oral medicine, is the branch of medicine focused on the teeth, gums, and mouth. It consists of the study, diagnosis, prevention, management, and treatment of diseases, disorders, and conditions of the mouth, most commonly focused on dentition (the development and arrangement of teeth) as well as the oral mucosa.[2] Dentistry may also encompass other aspects of the craniofacial complex including the temporomandibular joint. The practitioner is called a dentist.
The history of dentistry is almost as ancient as the history of humanity and civilization, with the earliest evidence dating from 7000 BC to 5500 BC.[3] Dentistry is thought to have been the first specialization in medicine which has gone on to develop its own accredited degree with its own specializations.[4] Dentistry is often also understood to subsume the now largely defunct medical specialty of stomatology (the study of the mouth and its disorders and diseases) for which reason the two terms are used interchangeably in certain regions. However, some specialties such as oral and maxillofacial surgery (facial reconstruction) may require both medical and dental degrees to accomplish. In European history, dentistry is considered to have stemmed from the trade of barber surgeons.[5]
Dental treatments are carried out by a dental team, which often consists of a dentist and dental auxiliaries (such as dental assistants, dental hygienists, dental technicians, and dental therapists). Most dentists either work in private practices (primary care), dental hospitals, or (secondary care) institutions (prisons, armed forces bases, etc.).
The modern movement of evidence-based dentistry calls for the use of high-quality scientific research and evidence to guide decision-making such as in manual tooth conservation, use of fluoride water treatment and fluoride toothpaste, dealing with oral diseases such as tooth decay and periodontitis, as well as systematic diseases such as osteoporosis, diabetes, celiac disease, cancer, and HIV/AIDS which could also affect the oral cavity. Other practices relevant to evidence-based dentistry include radiology of the mouth to inspect teeth deformity or oral malaises, haematology (study of blood) to avoid bleeding complications during dental surgery, cardiology (due to various severe complications arising from dental surgery with patients with heart disease), etc.
The term dentistry comes from dentist, which comes from French dentiste, which comes from the French and Latin words for tooth.[6] The term for the associated scientific study of teeth is odontology (from Ancient Greek: á½€δοÃÂÂÂÂÂÂÂς, romanized: odoús, lit. 'tooth') – the study of the structure, development, and abnormalities of the teeth.
Dentistry usually encompasses practices related to the oral cavity.[7] According to the World Health Organization, oral diseases are major public health problems due to their high incidence and prevalence across the globe, with the disadvantaged affected more than other socio-economic groups.[8]
The majority of dental treatments are carried out to prevent or treat the two most common oral diseases which are dental caries (tooth decay) and periodontal disease (gum disease or pyorrhea). Common treatments involve the restoration of teeth, extraction or surgical removal of teeth, scaling and root planing, endodontic root canal treatment, and cosmetic dentistry[9]
By nature of their general training, dentists, without specialization can carry out the majority of dental treatments such as restorative (fillings, crowns, bridges), prosthetic (dentures), endodontic (root canal) therapy, periodontal (gum) therapy, and extraction of teeth, as well as performing examinations, radiographs (x-rays), and diagnosis. Dentists can also prescribe medications used in the field such as antibiotics, sedatives, and any other drugs used in patient management. Depending on their licensing boards, general dentists may be required to complete additional training to perform sedation, dental implants, etc.
Dentists also encourage the prevention of oral diseases through proper hygiene and regular, twice or more yearly, checkups for professional cleaning and evaluation. Oral infections and inflammations may affect overall health and conditions in the oral cavity may be indicative of systemic diseases, such as osteoporosis, diabetes, celiac disease or cancer.[7][10][13][14] Many studies have also shown that gum disease is associated with an increased risk of diabetes, heart disease, and preterm birth. The concept that oral health can affect systemic health and disease is referred to as "oral-systemic health".
John M. Harris started the world's first dental school in Bainbridge, Ohio, and helped to establish dentistry as a health profession. It opened on 21 February 1828, and today is a dental museum.[15] The first dental college, Baltimore College of Dental Surgery, opened in Baltimore, Maryland, US in 1840. The second in the United States was the Ohio College of Dental Surgery, established in Cincinnati, Ohio, in 1845.[16] The Philadelphia College of Dental Surgery followed in 1852.[17] In 1907, Temple University accepted a bid to incorporate the school.
Studies show that dentists that graduated from different countries,[18] or even from different dental schools in one country,[19] may make different clinical decisions for the same clinical condition. For example, dentists that graduated from Israeli dental schools may recommend the removal of asymptomatic impacted third molar (wisdom teeth) more often than dentists that graduated from Latin American or Eastern European dental schools.[20]
In the United Kingdom, the first dental schools, the London School of Dental Surgery and the Metropolitan School of Dental Science, both in London, opened in 1859.[21] The British Dentists Act of 1878 and the 1879 Dentists Register limited the title of "dentist" and "dental surgeon" to qualified and registered practitioners.[22][23] However, others could legally describe themselves as "dental experts" or "dental consultants".[24] The practice of dentistry in the United Kingdom became fully regulated with the 1921 Dentists Act, which required the registration of anyone practising dentistry.[25] The British Dental Association, formed in 1880 with Sir John Tomes as president, played a major role in prosecuting dentists practising illegally.[22] Dentists in the United Kingdom are now regulated by the General Dental Council.
In many countries, dentists usually complete between five and eight years of post-secondary education before practising. Though not mandatory, many dentists choose to complete an internship or residency focusing on specific aspects of dental care after they have received their dental degree. In a few countries, to become a qualified dentist one must usually complete at least four years of postgraduate study;[26] Dental degrees awarded around the world include the Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS) and Doctor of Dental Medicine (DMD) in North America (US and Canada), and the Bachelor of Dental Surgery/Baccalaureus Dentalis Chirurgiae (BDS, BDent, BChD, BDSc) in the UK and current and former British Commonwealth countries.
All dentists in the United States undergo at least three years of undergraduate studies, but nearly all complete a bachelor's degree. This schooling is followed by four years of dental school to qualify as a "Doctor of Dental Surgery" (DDS) or "Doctor of Dental Medicine" (DMD). Specialization in dentistry is available in the fields of Anesthesiology, Dental Public Health, Endodontics, Oral Radiology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Medicine, Orofacial Pain, Pathology, Orthodontics, Pediatric Dentistry (Pedodontics), Periodontics, and Prosthodontics.[27]
Some dentists undertake further training after their initial degree in order to specialize. Exactly which subjects are recognized by dental registration bodies varies according to location. Examples include:
Tooth decay was low in pre-agricultural societies, but the advent of farming society about 10,000 years ago correlated with an increase in tooth decay (cavities).[32] An infected tooth from Italy partially cleaned with flint tools, between 13,820 and 14,160 years old, represents the oldest known dentistry,[33] although a 2017 study suggests that 130,000 years ago the Neanderthals already used rudimentary dentistry tools.[34] In Italy evidence dated to the Paleolithic, around 13,000 years ago, points to bitumen used to fill a tooth[35] and in Neolithic Slovenia, 6500 years ago, beeswax was used to close a fracture in a tooth.[36] The Indus valley has yielded evidence of dentistry being practised as far back as 7000 BC, during the Stone Age.[37] The Neolithic site of Mehrgarh (now in Pakistan's south western province of Balochistan) indicates that this form of dentistry involved curing tooth related disorders with bow drills operated, perhaps, by skilled bead-crafters.[3] The reconstruction of this ancient form of dentistry showed that the methods used were reliable and effective.[38] The earliest dental filling, made of beeswax, was discovered in Slovenia and dates from 6500 years ago.[39] Dentistry was practised in prehistoric Malta, as evidenced by a skull which had a dental abscess lanced from the root of a tooth dating back to around 2500 BC.[40]
An ancient Sumerian text describes a "tooth worm" as the cause of dental caries.[41] Evidence of this belief has also been found in ancient India, Egypt, Japan, and China. The legend of the worm is also found in the Homeric Hymns,[42] and as late as the 14th century AD the surgeon Guy de Chauliac still promoted the belief that worms cause tooth decay.[43]
Recipes for the treatment of toothache, infections and loose teeth are spread throughout the Ebers Papyrus, Kahun Papyri, Brugsch Papyrus, and Hearst papyrus of Ancient Egypt.[44] The Edwin Smith Papyrus, written in the 17th century BC but which may reflect previous manuscripts from as early as 3000 BC, discusses the treatment of dislocated or fractured jaws.[44][45] In the 18th century BC, the Code of Hammurabi referenced dental extraction twice as it related to punishment.[46] Examination of the remains of some ancient Egyptians and Greco-Romans reveals early attempts at dental prosthetics.[47] However, it is possible the prosthetics were prepared after death for aesthetic reasons.[44]
Ancient Greek scholars Hippocrates and Aristotle wrote about dentistry, including the eruption pattern of teeth, treating decayed teeth and gum disease, extracting teeth with forceps, and using wires to stabilize loose teeth and fractured jaws.[48] Use of dental appliances, bridges and dentures was applied by the Etruscans in northern Italy, from as early as 700 BC, of human or other animal teeth fastened together with gold bands.[49][50][51] The Romans had likely borrowed this technique by the 5th century BC.[50][52] The Phoenicians crafted dentures during the 6th–4th century BC, fashioning them from gold wire and incorporating two ivory teeth.[53] In ancient Egypt, Hesy-Ra is the first named "dentist" (greatest of the teeth). The Egyptians bound replacement teeth together with gold wire. Roman medical writer Cornelius Celsus wrote extensively of oral diseases as well as dental treatments such as narcotic-containing emollients and astringents.[54] The earliest dental amalgams were first documented in a Tang dynasty medical text written by the Chinese physician Su Kung in 659, and appeared in Germany in 1528.[55][56]
During the Islamic Golden Age Dentistry was discussed in several famous books of medicine such as The Canon in medicine written by Avicenna and Al-Tasreef by Al-Zahrawi who is considered the greatest surgeon of the Middle Ages,[57] Avicenna said that jaw fracture should be reduced according to the occlusal guidance of the teeth; this principle is still valid in modern times. Al-Zahrawi invented over 200 surgical tools that resemble the modern kind.[58]
Historically, dental extractions have been used to treat a variety of illnesses. During the Middle Ages and throughout the 19th century, dentistry was not a profession in itself, and often dental procedures were performed by barbers or general physicians. Barbers usually limited their practice to extracting teeth which alleviated pain and associated chronic tooth infection. Instruments used for dental extractions date back several centuries. In the 14th century, Guy de Chauliac most probably invented the dental pelican[59] (resembling a pelican's beak) which was used to perform dental extractions up until the late 18th century. The pelican was replaced by the dental key[60] which, in turn, was replaced by modern forceps in the 19th century.[61]
The first book focused solely on dentistry was the "Artzney Buchlein" in 1530,[48] and the first dental textbook written in English was called "Operator for the Teeth" by Charles Allen in 1685.[23]
In the United Kingdom, there was no formal qualification for the providers of dental treatment until 1859 and it was only in 1921 that the practice of dentistry was limited to those who were professionally qualified. The Royal Commission on the National Health Service in 1979 reported that there were then more than twice as many registered dentists per 10,000 population in the UK than there were in 1921.[62]
It was between 1650 and 1800 that the science of modern dentistry developed. The English physician Thomas Browne in his A Letter to a Friend (c. 1656 pub. 1690) made an early dental observation with characteristic humour:
The Egyptian Mummies that I have seen, have had their Mouths open, and somewhat gaping, which affordeth a good opportunity to view and observe their Teeth, wherein 'tis not easie to find any wanting or decayed: and therefore in Egypt, where one Man practised but one Operation, or the Diseases but of single Parts, it must needs be a barren Profession to confine unto that of drawing of Teeth, and little better than to have been Tooth-drawer unto King Pyrrhus, who had but two in his Head.
The French surgeon Pierre Fauchard became known as the "father of modern dentistry". Despite the limitations of the primitive surgical instruments during the late 17th and early 18th century, Fauchard was a highly skilled surgeon who made remarkable improvisations of dental instruments, often adapting tools from watchmakers, jewelers and even barbers, that he thought could be used in dentistry. He introduced dental fillings as treatment for dental cavities. He asserted that sugar-derived acids like tartaric acid were responsible for dental decay, and also suggested that tumors surrounding the teeth and in the gums could appear in the later stages of tooth decay.[63][64]
Fauchard was the pioneer of dental prosthesis, and he invented many methods to replace lost teeth. He suggested that substitutes could be made from carved blocks of ivory or bone. He also introduced dental braces, although they were initially made of gold, he discovered that the teeth position could be corrected as the teeth would follow the pattern of the wires. Waxed linen or silk threads were usually employed to fasten the braces. His contributions to the world of dental science consist primarily of his 1728 publication Le chirurgien dentiste or The Surgeon Dentist. The French text included "basic oral anatomy and function, dental construction, and various operative and restorative techniques, and effectively separated dentistry from the wider category of surgery".[63][64]
After Fauchard, the study of dentistry rapidly expanded. Two important books, Natural History of Human Teeth (1771) and Practical Treatise on the Diseases of the Teeth (1778), were published by British surgeon John Hunter. In 1763, he entered into a period of collaboration with the London-based dentist James Spence. He began to theorise about the possibility of tooth transplants from one person to another. He realised that the chances of a successful tooth transplant (initially, at least) would be improved if the donor tooth was as fresh as possible and was matched for size with the recipient. These principles are still used in the transplantation of internal organs. Hunter conducted a series of pioneering operations, in which he attempted a tooth transplant. Although the donated teeth never properly bonded with the recipients' gums, one of Hunter's patients stated that he had three which lasted for six years, a remarkable achievement for the period.[65]
Major advances in science were made in the 19th century, and dentistry evolved from a trade to a profession. The profession came under government regulation by the end of the 19th century. In the UK, the Dentist Act was passed in 1878 and the British Dental Association formed in 1879. In the same year, Francis Brodie Imlach was the first ever dentist to be elected President of the Royal College of Surgeons (Edinburgh), raising dentistry onto a par with clinical surgery for the first time.[66]
Long term occupational noise exposure can contribute to permanent hearing loss, which is referred to as noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and tinnitus. Noise exposure can cause excessive stimulation of the hearing mechanism, which damages the delicate structures of the inner ear.[67] NIHL can occur when an individual is exposed to sound levels above 90 dBA according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Regulations state that the permissible noise exposure levels for individuals is 90 dBA.[68] For the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), exposure limits are set to 85 dBA. Exposures below 85 dBA are not considered to be hazardous. Time limits are placed on how long an individual can stay in an environment above 85 dBA before it causes hearing loss. OSHA places that limitation at 8 hours for 85 dBA. The exposure time becomes shorter as the dBA level increases.
Within the field of dentistry, a variety of cleaning tools are used including piezoelectric and sonic scalers, and ultrasonic scalers and cleaners.[69] While a majority of the tools do not exceed 75 dBA,[70] prolonged exposure over many years can lead to hearing loss or complaints of tinnitus.[71] Few dentists have reported using personal hearing protective devices,[72][73] which could offset any potential hearing loss or tinnitus.
There is a movement in modern dentistry to place a greater emphasis on high-quality scientific evidence in decision-making. Evidence-based dentistry (EBD) uses current scientific evidence to guide decisions. It is an approach to oral health that requires the application and examination of relevant scientific data related to the patient's oral and medical health. Along with the dentist's professional skill and expertise, EBD allows dentists to stay up to date on the latest procedures and patients to receive improved treatment. A new paradigm for medical education designed to incorporate current research into education and practice was developed to help practitioners provide the best care for their patients.[74] It was first introduced by Gordon Guyatt and the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada in the 1990s. It is part of the larger movement toward evidence-based medicine and other evidence-based practices, especially since a major part of dentistry involves dealing with oral and systemic diseases. Other issues relevant to the dental field in terms of evidence-based research and evidence-based practice include population oral health, dental clinical practice, tooth morphology etc.
Dentistry is unique in that it requires dental students to have competence-based clinical skills that can only be acquired through supervised specialized laboratory training and direct patient care.[75] This necessitates the need for a scientific and professional basis of care with a foundation of extensive research-based education.[76] According to some experts, the accreditation of dental schools can enhance the quality and professionalism of dental education.[77][78]
cite web
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)