In the field of orthodontics, digital software tools have revolutionized the way practitioners approach case simulations, particularly when it comes to pediatric patients. These tools offer a blend of precision, efficiency, and patient engagement that traditional methods simply can't match. Let's dive into the overview of these digital software solutions, highlighting their benefits and suitability for young patients.
One of the standout features of digital software for orthodontic case simulations is the ability to create highly detailed 3D models of a patient's teeth and jaw. This level of detail allows orthodontists to plan treatments with unprecedented accuracy. For pediatric patients, whose teeth and jaws are still developing, this means treatments can be tailored more effectively to their unique growth patterns. Software like Invisalign's ClinCheck and OrthoCAD offer intuitive interfaces that enable orthodontists to simulate various treatment scenarios, helping them choose the most effective approach for each child.
Moreover, these digital tools enhance patient engagement, which is crucial when dealing with younger patients. Visual aids and simulations make it easier for children and their parents to understand the treatment process and expected outcomes. This can alleviate anxiety and foster a more cooperative attitude towards the treatment. Features like virtual treatment previews allow families to see the potential results before committing, building trust and excitement about the journey ahead.
Another significant advantage is the efficiency these tools bring to the diagnostic and planning phases. Digital impressions replace the need for messy traditional molds, making the experience more pleasant for children. Additionally, the ability to store and share digital records seamlessly across different devices and locations ensures that all involved in the child's care have access to the most current information, facilitating better collaboration among dental professionals.
In conclusion, the integration of digital software tools in orthodontic case simulations marks a significant advancement in the field, especially for pediatric patients. These tools not only enhance the precision and personalization of treatments but also improve the overall experience for young patients and their families. As technology continues to evolve, we can expect even more innovative solutions that will further transform orthodontic care for children.
In the realm of modern orthodontics, digital simulations have revolutionized the way treatments are planned, especially for children. The benefits of incorporating digital simulations into orthodontic treatment planning are multifaceted, ranging from enhanced communication with patients and parents to more precise and effective treatment outcomes.
One of the primary advantages of using digital simulations is the significant improvement in communication. Traditional methods of explaining orthodontic procedures can be complex and difficult for both children and their parents to fully grasp. However, with digital simulations, orthodontists can present a clear, visual representation of the proposed treatment plan. This allows parents and children to see exactly what changes will occur over the course of treatment, making it easier to understand and accept the process. It also helps in setting realistic expectations, which is crucial for maintaining a positive attitude throughout the treatment.
Furthermore, digital simulations facilitate a more collaborative approach to treatment planning. Parents and children can actively participate in the decision-making process, as they can visualize different treatment options and their potential outcomes. This engagement not only empowers patients but also fosters a sense of trust and partnership between the orthodontist and the family.
In terms of treatment outcomes, digital simulations offer unparalleled precision. Orthodontists can simulate various scenarios and predict the most effective treatment plan tailored to the unique needs of each patient. This level of customization ensures that the treatment is not only efficient but also minimizes the risk of complications. Additionally, digital simulations allow for continuous monitoring and adjustment of the treatment plan as needed, leading to more predictable and successful results.
Another notable benefit is the reduction in treatment time. By accurately planning each stage of the treatment, orthodontists can streamline the process, potentially shortening the overall duration. This is particularly beneficial for children, as it means less time spent in orthodontic appliances and fewer visits to the clinic.
In conclusion, the integration of digital simulations in orthodontic treatment planning for children brings numerous benefits. It enhances communication, encourages patient involvement, ensures precise and customized treatment, and may even reduce treatment time. As technology continues to advance, the role of digital simulations in orthodontics is poised to become even more significant, promising a future of more efficient and patient-friendly treatments.
Creating an orthodontic case simulation for a pediatric patient using digital software involves a systematic approach that ensures precision, efficiency, and excellent outcomes. Here's a step-by-step guide to help you through the process, from data collection to treatment planning.
First, data collection is crucial. Begin with a comprehensive clinical examination of the pediatric patient. This includes taking detailed intraoral and extraoral photographs, capturing panoramic and cephalometric radiographs, and obtaining study models of the patient's teeth. These records provide a foundational understanding of the patient's current dental and skeletal relationships.
Next, transition to digital model creation. Utilizing advanced digital scanning technology, capture high-resolution images of the patient's teeth and oral structures. These scans are then used to create accurate 3D digital models. Software platforms like Invisalign, OrthoAnalyzer, or similar tools allow for the manipulation and analysis of these models, offering a detailed view of the patient's dental anatomy.
With the digital models in hand, the treatment planning phase begins. This step is where the art and science of orthodontics converge. Start by analyzing the digital models to identify any malocclusions, spacing issues, or alignment problems. The software enables you to simulate various treatment scenarios, such as the application of braces or clear aligners, to predict outcomes and choose the most effective treatment plan.
Consider the growth and development patterns of pediatric patients during this phase. Orthodontic treatment in children must account for ongoing dental and skeletal growth, which can influence treatment timing and mechanics. Digital software aids in forecasting growth trends and adjusting treatment plans accordingly.
Finally, present the proposed treatment plan to the patient and their guardians. Use the digital simulations to visually explain the treatment process, expected outcomes, and any potential challenges. This not only enhances understanding but also fosters trust and compliance throughout the treatment journey.
In conclusion, creating an orthodontic case simulation for a pediatric patient with digital software is a detailed process that requires careful data collection, precise digital model creation, and thoughtful treatment planning. By leveraging technology, orthodontists can provide personalized, effective care that addresses the unique needs of young patients.
In the evolving world of orthodontics, digital simulations have revolutionized the way treatments are planned and visualized. This essay delves into the techniques for simulating various orthodontic treatments using cutting-edge digital software.
Orthodontic case simulations encompass a range of treatments including traditional braces, clear aligners like Invisalign, and functional appliances designed to correct jaw discrepancies. Digital software plays a pivotal role in these simulations by providing a platform where orthodontists can meticulously plan and predict the outcomes of these treatments.
One of the primary techniques involves the use of 3D imaging and modeling software. This allows orthodontists to create detailed virtual models of a patient's teeth and jaw. These models are not just static representations; they are dynamic, enabling clinicians to simulate the movement of teeth over time. For instance, when planning a treatment with braces, the software can predict how each tooth will move in response to the applied forces, allowing for adjustments in the treatment plan to achieve the desired outcome more efficiently.
Clear aligner simulations are another critical application of digital software in orthodontics. Programs like ClinCheck for Invisalign treatment enable orthodontists to visualize the gradual movement of teeth with each set of aligners. This not only aids in treatment planning but also enhances patient understanding and compliance, as they can see a virtual representation of their treatment progress.
Functional appliances, used to correct jaw discrepancies, also benefit from digital simulation techniques. Software can model the expected changes in jaw position and tooth alignment, helping orthodontists to design appliances that will most effectively address the patient's specific needs.
Moreover, these digital simulations facilitate better communication between orthodontists and patients. By presenting a visual representation of the proposed treatment and its expected outcomes, patients are more likely to understand the process and feel confident in their decision to proceed with treatment.
In conclusion, the use of digital software in simulating orthodontic treatments is a game-changer. It enhances treatment planning, improves patient communication, and ultimately leads to more effective and efficient orthodontic care. As technology continues to advance, we can expect these simulations to become even more sophisticated, further bridging the gap between planning and reality in orthodontic treatments.
Customizing treatment plans for children in orthodontics is crucial for achieving optimal results and ensuring patient satisfaction. With advancements in digital software, orthodontists can now simulate and tailor treatments more effectively based on individual patient needs, growth patterns, and dental development. Here are some tips for achieving this:
Firstly, a thorough initial assessment is essential. This includes capturing detailed digital scans of the patient's teeth and jaw, as well as photographs and X-rays. Digital software allows orthodontists to analyze these images to identify specific issues such as misalignment, spacing problems, or bite irregularities.
Understanding the child's growth pattern is another critical factor. Children's jaws and teeth are still developing, which means their growth patterns can significantly influence treatment outcomes. By using growth prediction tools within digital software, orthodontists can forecast how a child's teeth and jaw might develop over time. This helps in planning interventions that are not only effective in the short term but also sustainable as the child grows.
Customizing treatment plans also involves considering the unique dental development of each child. Some children may have early loss of baby teeth, impacting the alignment of permanent teeth. Others might have genetic factors influencing their dental arch shape. Digital simulations can help orthodontists predict how different treatment options will interact with these individual factors, allowing for more personalized care.
Incorporating patient-specific goals and preferences into the treatment plan is also vital. Children and their parents may have concerns about aesthetics, comfort, or the duration of treatment. Digital software enables orthodontists to simulate various treatment scenarios, showing patients the potential outcomes of different approaches. This transparency helps in building trust and ensuring that the treatment plan aligns with the patient's expectations.
Finally, continuous monitoring and adjustment of the treatment plan are necessary. As children grow and their teeth develop, regular check-ups and digital scans can help orthodontists make necessary adjustments to the treatment plan. This ensures that the plan remains effective and aligned with the child's evolving needs.
In conclusion, customizing orthodontic treatment plans for children using digital software involves a comprehensive initial assessment, understanding growth patterns, considering individual dental development, incorporating patient preferences, and continuous monitoring. This approach not only enhances treatment outcomes but also improves the overall patient experience.
In the modern era of healthcare, technology plays a pivotal role in enhancing patient care and outcomes. Within the realm of pediatric orthodontics, digital simulations have emerged as a transformative tool, significantly impacting the way treatment progress is monitored and adjustments are made for optimal results.
Digital simulations, facilitated by advanced software, allow orthodontists to create a virtual model of a patient's teeth and jaw structure. This model is not static; it evolves as the treatment progresses, providing real-time insights into how the teeth are responding to interventions. By simulating various treatment scenarios, orthodontists can predict outcomes and make informed decisions about the most effective course of action.
One of the key advantages of digital simulations is their ability to facilitate precise monitoring of treatment progress. Traditional methods often rely on periodic assessments, which may not capture the subtleties of tooth movement or jaw alignment. In contrast, digital simulations offer a continuous stream of data, enabling orthodontists to detect even minor deviations from the expected trajectory. This level of detail allows for timely interventions, ensuring that treatment stays on track and adjustments are made as needed.
Moreover, digital simulations empower orthodontists to engage patients and their families in the treatment process. By visualizing the anticipated outcomes, patients gain a clearer understanding of the treatment goals and the steps involved in achieving them. This transparency fosters a collaborative environment, where patients are more likely to adhere to treatment protocols and maintain good oral hygiene practices.
In addition to enhancing patient care, digital simulations contribute to the optimization of treatment outcomes. By simulating different treatment scenarios, orthodontists can identify the most effective strategies for addressing specific orthodontic issues. This proactive approach minimizes the risk of complications and reduces the likelihood of treatment failures, ultimately leading to better long-term results for patients.
In conclusion, the integration of digital simulations into pediatric orthodontics represents a significant advancement in the field. By providing real-time monitoring, precise adjustments, and enhanced patient engagement, digital simulations contribute to improved treatment outcomes and a more satisfying patient experience. As technology continues to evolve, it is likely that digital simulations will play an increasingly central role in shaping the future of orthodontic care.
As technology continues to evolve, the field of orthodontics is poised for transformative changes, particularly with the integration of digital simulations in orthodontic case management. These advancements are not only enhancing the precision and efficiency of treatments but also significantly improving patient experiences, especially among children.
One of the most exciting future trends in digital orthodontic simulations is the increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms. These technologies can analyze vast amounts of data from previous cases to predict treatment outcomes more accurately. For children, this means customized treatment plans that are tailored to their unique dental structures and growth patterns, leading to more effective and faster results.
Another advancement on the horizon is the development of more interactive and immersive simulation tools. Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are being explored to create environments where both orthodontists and patients can visualize the treatment process in a three-dimensional space. This can be particularly beneficial for kids, as it helps them understand what to expect during their treatment, reducing anxiety and increasing compliance.
The integration of tele-orthodontics with digital simulations is also a promising trend. This allows for remote monitoring and adjustments to treatment plans, making it easier for families to manage orthodontic care without frequent visits to the clinic. For children, this could mean fewer disruptions to their school schedules and a more convenient treatment process overall.
Moreover, the ongoing improvement in 3D printing technology is set to revolutionize the fabrication of orthodontic appliances. Custom brackets, aligners, and other devices can be produced with higher precision and at a faster rate. This not only enhances the effectiveness of the treatment but also reduces the time children need to wear these appliances, making the overall experience more comfortable.
In conclusion, the future of orthodontics, driven by digital simulations and advanced technologies, holds great promise for enhancing the treatment of children. These innovations are set to make orthodontic care more personalized, efficient, and patient-friendly, ultimately leading to better outcomes and experiences for young patients.
![]() A pediatrician examines a neonate.
|
|
Focus | Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults |
---|---|
Subdivisions | Paediatric cardiology, neonatology, critical care, pediatric oncology, hospital medicine, primary care, others (see below) |
Significant diseases | Congenital diseases, Infectious diseases, Childhood cancer, Mental disorders |
Significant tests | World Health Organization Child Growth Standards |
Specialist | Pediatrician |
Glossary | Glossary of medicine |
Pediatrics (American English) also spelled paediatrics (British English), is the branch of medicine that involves the medical care of infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. In the United Kingdom, pediatrics covers many of their youth until the age of 18.[1] The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends people seek pediatric care through the age of 21, but some pediatric subspecialists continue to care for adults up to 25.[2][3] Worldwide age limits of pediatrics have been trending upward year after year.[4] A medical doctor who specializes in this area is known as a pediatrician, or paediatrician. The word pediatrics and its cognates mean "healer of children", derived from the two Greek words: παá¿–ς (pais "child") and á¼°ατρÃÂÂÂÅ’ς (iatros "doctor, healer"). Pediatricians work in clinics, research centers, universities, general hospitals and children's hospitals, including those who practice pediatric subspecialties (e.g. neonatology requires resources available in a NICU).
The earliest mentions of child-specific medical problems appear in the Hippocratic Corpus, published in the fifth century B.C., and the famous Sacred Disease. These publications discussed topics such as childhood epilepsy and premature births. From the first to fourth centuries A.D., Greek philosophers and physicians Celsus, Soranus of Ephesus, Aretaeus, Galen, and Oribasius, also discussed specific illnesses affecting children in their works, such as rashes, epilepsy, and meningitis.[5] Already Hippocrates, Aristotle, Celsus, Soranus, and Galen[6] understood the differences in growing and maturing organisms that necessitated different treatment: Ex toto non sic pueri ut viri curari debent ("In general, boys should not be treated in the same way as men").[7] Some of the oldest traces of pediatrics can be discovered in Ancient India where children's doctors were called kumara bhrtya.[6]
Even though some pediatric works existed during this time, they were scarce and rarely published due to a lack of knowledge in pediatric medicine. Sushruta Samhita, an ayurvedic text composed during the sixth century BCE, contains the text about pediatrics.[8] Another ayurvedic text from this period is Kashyapa Samhita.[9][10] A second century AD manuscript by the Greek physician and gynecologist Soranus of Ephesus dealt with neonatal pediatrics.[11] Byzantine physicians Oribasius, Aëtius of Amida, Alexander Trallianus, and Paulus Aegineta contributed to the field.[6] The Byzantines also built brephotrophia (crêches).[6] Islamic Golden Age writers served as a bridge for Greco-Roman and Byzantine medicine and added ideas of their own, especially Haly Abbas, Yahya Serapion, Abulcasis, Avicenna, and Averroes. The Persian philosopher and physician al-Razi (865–925), sometimes called the father of pediatrics, published a monograph on pediatrics titled Diseases in Children.[12][13] Also among the first books about pediatrics was Libellus [Opusculum] de aegritudinibus et remediis infantium 1472 ("Little Book on Children Diseases and Treatment"), by the Italian pediatrician Paolo Bagellardo.[14][5] In sequence came Bartholomäus Metlinger's Ein Regiment der Jungerkinder 1473, Cornelius Roelans (1450–1525) no title Buchlein, or Latin compendium, 1483, and Heinrich von Louffenburg (1391–1460) Versehung des Leibs written in 1429 (published 1491), together form the Pediatric Incunabula, four great medical treatises on children's physiology and pathology.[6]
While more information about childhood diseases became available, there was little evidence that children received the same kind of medical care that adults did.[15] It was during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries that medical experts started offering specialized care for children.[5] The Swedish physician Nils Rosén von Rosenstein (1706–1773) is considered to be the founder of modern pediatrics as a medical specialty,[16][17] while his work The diseases of children, and their remedies (1764) is considered to be "the first modern textbook on the subject".[18] However, it was not until the nineteenth century that medical professionals acknowledged pediatrics as a separate field of medicine. The first pediatric-specific publications appeared between the 1790s and the 1920s.[19]
The term pediatrics was first introduced in English in 1859 by Abraham Jacobi. In 1860, he became "the first dedicated professor of pediatrics in the world."[20] Jacobi is known as the father of American pediatrics because of his many contributions to the field.[21][22] He received his medical training in Germany and later practiced in New York City.[23]
The first generally accepted pediatric hospital is the Hôpital des Enfants Malades (French: Hospital for Sick Children), which opened in Paris in June 1802 on the site of a previous orphanage.[24] From its beginning, this famous hospital accepted patients up to the age of fifteen years,[25] and it continues to this day as the pediatric division of the Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, created in 1920 by merging with the nearby Necker Hospital, founded in 1778.[26]
In other European countries, the Charité (a hospital founded in 1710) in Berlin established a separate Pediatric Pavilion in 1830, followed by similar institutions at Saint Petersburg in 1834, and at Vienna and Breslau (now WrocÅ‚aw), both in 1837. In 1852 Britain's first pediatric hospital, the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street was founded by Charles West.[24] The first Children's hospital in Scotland opened in 1860 in Edinburgh.[27] In the US, the first similar institutions were the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, which opened in 1855, and then Boston Children's Hospital (1869).[28] Subspecialties in pediatrics were created at the Harriet Lane Home at Johns Hopkins by Edwards A. Park.[29]
The body size differences are paralleled by maturation changes. The smaller body of an infant or neonate is substantially different physiologically from that of an adult. Congenital defects, genetic variance, and developmental issues are of greater concern to pediatricians than they often are to adult physicians. A common adage is that children are not simply "little adults". The clinician must take into account the immature physiology of the infant or child when considering symptoms, prescribing medications, and diagnosing illnesses.[30]
Pediatric physiology directly impacts the pharmacokinetic properties of drugs that enter the body. The absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of medications differ between developing children and grown adults.[30][31][32] Despite completed studies and reviews, continual research is needed to better understand how these factors should affect the decisions of healthcare providers when prescribing and administering medications to the pediatric population.[30]
Many drug absorption differences between pediatric and adult populations revolve around the stomach. Neonates and young infants have increased stomach pH due to decreased acid secretion, thereby creating a more basic environment for drugs that are taken by mouth.[31][30][32] Acid is essential to degrading certain oral drugs before systemic absorption. Therefore, the absorption of these drugs in children is greater than in adults due to decreased breakdown and increased preservation in a less acidic gastric space.[31]
Children also have an extended rate of gastric emptying, which slows the rate of drug absorption.[31][32]
Drug absorption also depends on specific enzymes that come in contact with the oral drug as it travels through the body. Supply of these enzymes increase as children continue to develop their gastrointestinal tract.[31][32] Pediatric patients have underdeveloped proteins, which leads to decreased metabolism and increased serum concentrations of specific drugs. However, prodrugs experience the opposite effect because enzymes are necessary for allowing their active form to enter systemic circulation.[31]
Percentage of total body water and extracellular fluid volume both decrease as children grow and develop with time. Pediatric patients thus have a larger volume of distribution than adults, which directly affects the dosing of hydrophilic drugs such as beta-lactam antibiotics like ampicillin.[31] Thus, these drugs are administered at greater weight-based doses or with adjusted dosing intervals in children to account for this key difference in body composition.[31][30]
Infants and neonates also have fewer plasma proteins. Thus, highly protein-bound drugs have fewer opportunities for protein binding, leading to increased distribution.[30]
Drug metabolism primarily occurs via enzymes in the liver and can vary according to which specific enzymes are affected in a specific stage of development.[31] Phase I and Phase II enzymes have different rates of maturation and development, depending on their specific mechanism of action (i.e. oxidation, hydrolysis, acetylation, methylation, etc.). Enzyme capacity, clearance, and half-life are all factors that contribute to metabolism differences between children and adults.[31][32] Drug metabolism can even differ within the pediatric population, separating neonates and infants from young children.[30]
Drug elimination is primarily facilitated via the liver and kidneys.[31] In infants and young children, the larger relative size of their kidneys leads to increased renal clearance of medications that are eliminated through urine.[32] In preterm neonates and infants, their kidneys are slower to mature and thus are unable to clear as much drug as fully developed kidneys. This can cause unwanted drug build-up, which is why it is important to consider lower doses and greater dosing intervals for this population.[30][31] Diseases that negatively affect kidney function can also have the same effect and thus warrant similar considerations.[31]
A major difference between the practice of pediatric and adult medicine is that children, in most jurisdictions and with certain exceptions, cannot make decisions for themselves. The issues of guardianship, privacy, legal responsibility, and informed consent must always be considered in every pediatric procedure. Pediatricians often have to treat the parents and sometimes, the family, rather than just the child. Adolescents are in their own legal class, having rights to their own health care decisions in certain circumstances. The concept of legal consent combined with the non-legal consent (assent) of the child when considering treatment options, especially in the face of conditions with poor prognosis or complicated and painful procedures/surgeries, means the pediatrician must take into account the desires of many people, in addition to those of the patient.[citation needed]
The term autonomy is traceable to ethical theory and law, where it states that autonomous individuals can make decisions based on their own logic.[33] Hippocrates was the first to use the term in a medical setting. He created a code of ethics for doctors called the Hippocratic Oath that highlighted the importance of putting patients' interests first, making autonomy for patients a top priority in health care.[34]
In ancient times, society did not view pediatric medicine as essential or scientific.[35] Experts considered professional medicine unsuitable for treating children. Children also had no rights. Fathers regarded their children as property, so their children's health decisions were entrusted to them.[5] As a result, mothers, midwives, "wise women", and general practitioners treated the children instead of doctors.[35] Since mothers could not rely on professional medicine to take care of their children, they developed their own methods, such as using alkaline soda ash to remove the vernix at birth and treating teething pain with opium or wine. The absence of proper pediatric care, rights, and laws in health care to prioritize children's health led to many of their deaths. Ancient Greeks and Romans sometimes even killed healthy female babies and infants with deformities since they had no adequate medical treatment and no laws prohibiting infanticide.[5]
In the twentieth century, medical experts began to put more emphasis on children's rights. In 1989, in the United Nations Rights of the Child Convention, medical experts developed the Best Interest Standard of Child to prioritize children's rights and best interests. This event marked the onset of pediatric autonomy. In 1995, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) finally acknowledged the Best Interest Standard of a Child as an ethical principle for pediatric decision-making, and it is still being used today.[34]
The majority of the time, parents have the authority to decide what happens to their child. Philosopher John Locke argued that it is the responsibility of parents to raise their children and that God gave them this authority. In modern society, Jeffrey Blustein, modern philosopher and author of the book Parents and Children: The Ethics of Family, argues that parental authority is granted because the child requires parents to satisfy their needs. He believes that parental autonomy is more about parents providing good care for their children and treating them with respect than parents having rights.[36] The researcher Kyriakos Martakis, MD, MSc, explains that research shows parental influence negatively affects children's ability to form autonomy. However, involving children in the decision-making process allows children to develop their cognitive skills and create their own opinions and, thus, decisions about their health. Parental authority affects the degree of autonomy the child patient has. As a result, in Argentina, the new National Civil and Commercial Code has enacted various changes to the healthcare system to encourage children and adolescents to develop autonomy. It has become more crucial to let children take accountability for their own health decisions.[37]
In most cases, the pediatrician, parent, and child work as a team to make the best possible medical decision. The pediatrician has the right to intervene for the child's welfare and seek advice from an ethics committee. However, in recent studies, authors have denied that complete autonomy is present in pediatric healthcare. The same moral standards should apply to children as they do to adults. In support of this idea is the concept of paternalism, which negates autonomy when it is in the patient's interests. This concept aims to keep the child's best interests in mind regarding autonomy. Pediatricians can interact with patients and help them make decisions that will benefit them, thus enhancing their autonomy. However, radical theories that question a child's moral worth continue to be debated today.[37] Authors often question whether the treatment and equality of a child and an adult should be the same. Author Tamar Schapiro notes that children need nurturing and cannot exercise the same level of authority as adults.[38] Hence, continuing the discussion on whether children are capable of making important health decisions until this day.
According to the Subcommittee of Clinical Ethics of the Argentinean Pediatric Society (SAP), children can understand moral feelings at all ages and can make reasonable decisions based on those feelings. Therefore, children and teens are deemed capable of making their own health decisions when they reach the age of 13. Recently, studies made on the decision-making of children have challenged that age to be 12.[37]
Technology has made several modern advancements that contribute to the future development of child autonomy, for example, unsolicited findings (U.F.s) of pediatric exome sequencing. They are findings based on pediatric exome sequencing that explain in greater detail the intellectual disability of a child and predict to what extent it will affect the child in the future. Genetic and intellectual disorders in children make them incapable of making moral decisions, so people look down upon this kind of testing because the child's future autonomy is at risk. It is still in question whether parents should request these types of testing for their children. Medical experts argue that it could endanger the autonomous rights the child will possess in the future. However, the parents contend that genetic testing would benefit the welfare of their children since it would allow them to make better health care decisions.[39] Exome sequencing for children and the decision to grant parents the right to request them is a medically ethical issue that many still debate today.
![]() |
The examples and perspective in this section deal primarily with United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject.(September 2019)
|
Aspiring medical students will need 4 years of undergraduate courses at a college or university, which will get them a BS, BA or other bachelor's degree. After completing college, future pediatricians will need to attend 4 years of medical school (MD/DO/MBBS) and later do 3 more years of residency training, the first year of which is called "internship." After completing the 3 years of residency, physicians are eligible to become certified in pediatrics by passing a rigorous test that deals with medical conditions related to young children.[citation needed]
In high school, future pediatricians are required to take basic science classes such as biology, chemistry, physics, algebra, geometry, and calculus. It is also advisable to learn a foreign language (preferably Spanish in the United States) and be involved in high school organizations and extracurricular activities. After high school, college students simply need to fulfill the basic science course requirements that most medical schools recommend and will need to prepare to take the MCAT (Medical College Admission Test) in their junior or early senior year in college. Once attending medical school, student courses will focus on basic medical sciences like human anatomy, physiology, chemistry, etc., for the first three years, the second year of which is when medical students start to get hands-on experience with actual patients.[40]
![]() |
|
Occupation | |
---|---|
Names |
|
Occupation type
|
Specialty |
Activity sectors
|
Medicine |
Description | |
Education required
|
|
Fields of
employment |
Hospitals, Clinics |
The training of pediatricians varies considerably across the world. Depending on jurisdiction and university, a medical degree course may be either undergraduate-entry or graduate-entry. The former commonly takes five or six years and has been usual in the Commonwealth. Entrants to graduate-entry courses (as in the US), usually lasting four or five years, have previously completed a three- or four-year university degree, commonly but by no means always in sciences. Medical graduates hold a degree specific to the country and university in and from which they graduated. This degree qualifies that medical practitioner to become licensed or registered under the laws of that particular country, and sometimes of several countries, subject to requirements for "internship" or "conditional registration".
Pediatricians must undertake further training in their chosen field. This may take from four to eleven or more years depending on jurisdiction and the degree of specialization.
In the United States, a medical school graduate wishing to specialize in pediatrics must undergo a three-year residency composed of outpatient, inpatient, and critical care rotations. Subspecialties within pediatrics require further training in the form of 3-year fellowships. Subspecialties include critical care, gastroenterology, neurology, infectious disease, hematology/oncology, rheumatology, pulmonology, child abuse, emergency medicine, endocrinology, neonatology, and others.[41]
In most jurisdictions, entry-level degrees are common to all branches of the medical profession, but in some jurisdictions, specialization in pediatrics may begin before completion of this degree. In some jurisdictions, pediatric training is begun immediately following the completion of entry-level training. In other jurisdictions, junior medical doctors must undertake generalist (unstreamed) training for a number of years before commencing pediatric (or any other) specialization. Specialist training is often largely under the control of 'pediatric organizations (see below) rather than universities and depends on the jurisdiction.
Subspecialties of pediatrics include:
(not an exhaustive list)
(not an exhaustive list)
By writing a monograph on 'Diseases in Children' he may also be looked upon as the father of paediatrics.
Rosen von Rosenstein.
Redirect to: